Page 2 of 2

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:08 am
by William Brave
wormcode wrote:It depends on how knowledgeable you are about synthesis as well. Some of the simpler ones can be easier to get things done in because of less options available, so it's less confusing and time consuming.

Not accusing anyone of anything, but also paying for them will make loads of difference because of the investment. You'll spend a lot more time learning it to try and get your money's worth. I'm sure we've all got dozens of freeware plugins still installed that we've opened maybe one or two times, but try to get that one that cost a couple of hundred into every tune possible.
Accuse away!!! Ive definitely used cracks .I guess you're right in that it does cheapen the value a bit. That being said plenty of people, myself included, have bought things they've ended up never using. Lex Luger has an mpc that just collects dust.

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:09 pm
by PhotonOfficial
Most of the deep kind of dubstep I was talking about doesn't really use much complicated sounds. A simple resonant sub bass as the main bass in the song can sound a beast if it is produced properly.

I understand what you are saying, but say if you listen to this:

The actual bass used in it is pretty simple to make yet it sounds immense.

Sorry for my confusion before:(

Oh and i'm thinking about removing the fact that i'm 14. It seems that just because i'm 14 people think i haven't actually 'put this to practice'

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:54 pm
by Turnipish_Thoughts
No offense but being 14 is a pretty major influence in not being able to comprehend more advanced aspects of production/composition properly. As you grow your mind deepens exponentially and your awareness in general caters to subtleties beyond the scope of a younger mind. That being said it doesn't mean great music can't be made by younger people, it just means that, amongst other things, a deeper experience from a longer time spent living isn't there to transfer into an emotional message within the music. Think back to your mental scope when you were 9, 5 years ago, now imagine yourself 5 years from now, and 5 years on from then. You get the idea.

As you grow your system of understanding develops and questions such as "are simple synths better" are no more than a fleeting question with the answer immediately obvious. Of course they aren't better, their potential scope for sound design increases ten fold per possible application/combination of parameter.

I'm not being condescending, although some may see it this way, I'm just being honest about something younger people might find offensive.

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:45 am
by wormcode
William Brave wrote:
wormcode wrote:It depends on how knowledgeable you are about synthesis as well. Some of the simpler ones can be easier to get things done in because of less options available, so it's less confusing and time consuming.

Not accusing anyone of anything, but also paying for them will make loads of difference because of the investment. You'll spend a lot more time learning it to try and get your money's worth. I'm sure we've all got dozens of freeware plugins still installed that we've opened maybe one or two times, but try to get that one that cost a couple of hundred into every tune possible.
Accuse away!!! Ive definitely used cracks .I guess you're right in that it does cheapen the value a bit. That being said plenty of people, myself included, have bought things they've ended up never using. Lex Luger has an mpc that just collects dust.
Oh I know, I've got much sought after rare synths sitting on my desk that haven't been turned on in a year.
anyway I didn't know you were 14 (unless they meant someone else), so yeah start small and learn synthesis. I'd recommend checking out some books from a library. It's a good time to go to libraries because many of them are so hungry for people to keep reading books, a lot of them offer books for free now. I'd also recommend checking out Programming Analogue Synths (free pdf- http://www.gearslutz.com/board/attachme ... synths.pdf). It came with Access Virus synths, but it can be applied to pretty much any synth both hardware or software since it's basic subtractive synthesis info.

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:18 am
by deadly_habit
http://deadlyhabit.com/sampleswap/Documents/ heh have a couple of em in there

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:58 am
by Artie_Fufkin
^some great stuff in there. I almost felt like going through the FM stuff and learning it. Had a go with FMMF for a little bit, but then I listened to some Depeche Mode....

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:44 am
by William Brave
I ain't 14 mang

Re: Are simple synths better

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:47 am
by William Brave
Yeah I was reading the Sound on Sound Synth Secrets and read like 20 chapters of it. I can definitely get my way around a synth. I'm gonna check these resources out though. Thanks!