Page 2 of 4

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:48 pm
by cloquet
noam wrote:
cloquet wrote:
noam wrote:
defoxster wrote:Someone mentioned 1984 already but most of Orwell's I would class as "Classics."
Lord of the rings.
Trainspotting.
Clockwork Orange
Hitchhikers guide....

Ive recently read alot of Brett Eaton Ellis books. Some might say they are cult or modern "Classics." I'm probably confusing matters :6:
they'd just be called 'modern classics' i think!
I think 'trainspotting' would also fall into that category
i meant all of the above

tbh, anything post-1900 is a 'modern' classic i think??\
ah. yeah, probably. it's a tricky one. the majority of the stuff in this thread would fall into the 'modern classic' category tbf.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:48 pm
by cloquet
hutyluty wrote:ulysses
finnegan's wake

put you off reading for life
:lol:

if we're going down that road...


proust

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:55 pm
by dubfordessert
noam wrote:The Brothers Karamazov
The Gambler
Nausea
Metamorphosis
now THIS

THIS

is a post i can get behind.

joeki's Russian Greats ofc

i almost have nothing to say here.

1 of my slightly less popular favourites... The Damned (La-Bas) - Joris-Karl Huysmans

Emile Zola's decadent, slightly less successful mate

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:56 pm
by dubfordessert
i have very unimaginative taste in books really

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:58 pm
by Johnlenham
The Hobbit and Fear and Loathing are pretty good. Not sure classic level but still.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:05 pm
by hutyluty
Johnlenham wrote:The Hobbit and Fear and Loathing are pretty good. Not sure classic level but still.
im always amazed the same guy wrote the hobbit and lord of the rings. They seem completely different.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:06 pm
by defoxster
wub wrote:Last thing I need in my life is more Bret Easton Ellis books, trust :lol:
Haha ok then... On a diff note I found Moby Dick extremely difficult to read. Does this mean I'm gonna struggle with a lot of the other books here? I know that the reason I got lost was because of the old English but are the others mentioned on this thread of a similar calibre?

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:07 pm
by Steve_French
Image

sorry

does Of Mice and Men count?

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:08 pm
by joeki
^^ I seriously make notes when reading a book with a lot of characters. I'm not ashamed to admit it.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:08 pm
by ehbes
In Cold Blood

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:09 pm
by Shum
wub wrote:A satirical view of capitalism/global expansion, brilliant.
Or a manual to shape children into modes of consumerism: Consume and become beautiful.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:22 pm
by Shum
Can't argue with most of the calls in this thread. I'll add The Thousand and One Nights (Arabian Nights).

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:59 pm
by noam
joeki wrote:^^ I seriously make notes when reading a book with a lot of characters. I'm not ashamed to admit it.
ive been told to do that with Crime and Punishment

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:26 am
by ch3
Okay, so from, as we established, modern classics:

Mikhail Bulgakov's 'The Master And Margarita' - brilliant book about good and evil (Satan visits Moscow)
Gabriel García Márquez's 'One Hundred Years Of Solitude' - maybe not to everyone's taste, as it's written in magical realist style - story of several generations of a Colombian family
Vladimir Nabokov's 'Lolita' - you might have seen the film, book is much better, full of wordplay and fun to read
William Golding's 'Lord Of The Flies' - again, as usual, I find book better than film. This one seriously moved me

I just realised the list I'm making are the books I actually want to reread. I should stop now or it will get too long :P

Few good ones were already mentioned, so won't repeat!

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:10 am
by SCope13
+1 on Dorian Grey.

Anything by Kafka
The Stranger by Camus.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:13 am
by tyger
william blake

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:16 am
by _v_
Shantaram. A personal classic.

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:49 am
by frank grimes jr.
Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man

Dumas, Count of Monte Cristo

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:20 am
by knell
so many good ones posted thus far, but to add two that aren't already here:

The Giver
Maniac Magee

(4th grade reading level, but i still crack them both open from time to time, and they still make me well up. no shame.)

Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:27 am
by dreamizm
Peep some Hardy, some Conrad and some Kafka in that order then come back to this thread