Dubstepforum.com

These pricks feed off of attention. Don't give it to them and they lose.

Mehlovich wrote:Why isn't anyone beating the shit out of theese people while they're protesting???
Seriously if this was going on in Denmark (and probably lots of other countries) there would be tons of people fucking up every single one of their protests.
C'mon America....

Good, America is at least most civilized than a country where people get beat up for being assholes.

^ Nah fuck that bullshit, in what way do they not deserve a fucking beating

In the way that the only type of justifiable violence is out of self-defense. They's trollin', man. Fuck 'em. Or just dress up in assless chaps and rainbow wifebeaters and hug them

So we're still giving these guys attention then?

Agent 47 wrote:^ Nah fuck that bullshit, in what way do they not deserve a fucking beating

Because I wouldn't want to people to kick the shit out of me if they disagreed with me strongly, and I like to treat people how I'd like to be treated. Kicking the shit out of what is a minority group representing a school of belief for holding that belief is a bit ironic in this situation.

garethom wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:^ Nah fuck that bullshit, in what way do they not deserve a fucking beating

Because I wouldn't want to people to kick the shit out of me if they disagreed with me strongly, and I like to treat people how I'd like to be treated. Kicking the shit out of what is a minority group representing a school of belief for holding that belief is a bit ironic in this situation.

My only problem with this argument is that what the WBC is saying is extremely offensive and hurtful to a huge amount of people. Now I'm not saying that we should all go down to Kansas and kick the shit out of them, but something should happen I believe...what they "preach" is too hurtful to be protected under the first amendment IMO

all speech has to be free for it to work.

Nevalo wrote:all speech has to be free for it to work.

There are exceptions to the first amendment...

Haha, too hurtful. This generation.

Yeah let's go back to good ol' days when saying n***er was acceptable

ehbrums1 wrote:

garethom wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:^ Nah fuck that bullshit, in what way do they not deserve a fucking beating

Because I wouldn't want to people to kick the shit out of me if they disagreed with me strongly, and I like to treat people how I'd like to be treated. Kicking the shit out of what is a minority group representing a school of belief for holding that belief is a bit ironic in this situation.

My only problem with this argument is that what the WBC is saying is extremely offensive and hurtful to a huge amount of people. Now I'm not saying that we should all go down to Kansas and kick the shit out of them, but something should happen I believe...what they "preach" is too hurtful to be protected under the first amendment IMO

Meh, I can see your point, I'm just of the strongly held opinion that nobody should be banned from saying anything, or not say it under the threat of violent. I'd hope one day for a world where we can hear what somebody says and just disagree with it, discuss shit, and decide whether or not to go ahead with it. In some cases it's easy, and society, not laws, should be able to decide that.

Somebody once said on here that we have the right to be protected from the opinions of assholes, and I said that it was probably once a pretty unpopular opinion for other races to have the same rights as white folk in the USA, should we have banned the people that were calling for it?

We'll never expose idiocy, or help change people's opinions or have true, levelled discussions if we can't talk about it. Not like these people seem to be getting anybody on board with it.

I just don't think "the mob" can or should decide what people are allowed to say.

Not gonna push this anymore because I know pretty much everyone here will disagree with me, but just remember one day that you might wanna say something that other people don't wanna hear, and you might get banned too. I know somebody on here will try and act like this is me trying to justify racism or that I hate women and wanna oppress minorities or something, so whatever.

Peace out.

'Too hurtful' is way too relative of a term. I don't feel hurt or offended by what they're saying because I can't take them seriously. Ignore them and they stop being offensive. Or like I said, get some gay dudes to start dancing with them like Michael Moore and that sodomobile shit.

It's a slippery slope when you start making exceptions just cuz it's hurtful to a lot of people.

ehbrums1 wrote:Yeah let's go back to good ol' days when saying n***er was acceptable

Saying n!gg3r is protected by the first amendment too you know...

garethom wrote: I know somebody on here will try and act like this is me trying to justify racism or that I hate women and wanna oppress minorities or something, so whatever.

Peace out.

ehbrums1 wrote:Yeah let's go back to good ol' days when saying n***er was acceptable

Told ya.

Genevieve wrote:

ehbrums1 wrote:Yeah let's go back to good ol' days when saying n***er was acceptable

Saying n!gg3r is protected by the first amendment too you know...

This was more in response I nowaysj. But in general there are a lot thing I don't agree with the constitution on

You have the choice to be, or not to be hurt by hateful language. To my knowledge, that church does not advocate violence. Short of that (and even then) they should be left to say whatever they want. Why it is covered again and again in the media... that's for ehb's sake.

brand did a great job in this

people with the most ill informed opinions also shout the loudest

all you can do is not listen or offer a counter point

the best way to deal with people like this is to picket their picketing, but in larger numbers

if a few hundred people turned up with anti-wbc signs and megaphones an ting they'd shut up and go away

People don't seem to realize that you can't 'beat' the WBC. Offer them counter points, they will ignore you and keep spraying their bullshit in your face.
Picket their pickets and they will be happy because it will get them more attention in newspapers etc.

Just ignore them like you would ignore Parson in a thread about HAARP. Or get them made illegal. And then ignore them. Whatevz

nowaysj wrote:You have the choice to be, or not to be hurt by hateful language. To my knowledge, that church does not advocate violence. Short of that (and even then) they should be left to say whatever they want. Why it is covered again and again in the media... that's for ehb's sake.

even at someone's funeral? should we set no limits on anything? what would you do if they were at the funeral of one of your loved ones?

NilsFG wrote:People don't seem to realize that you can't 'beat' the WBC. Offer them counter points, they will ignore you and keep spraying their bullshit in your face.
Picket their pickets and they will be happy because it will get them more attention in newspapers etc.

Just ignore them like you would ignore Parson in a thread about HAARP. Or get them made illegal. And then ignore them. Whatevz

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure by them being officially labelled as a hate group it would be illegal for them to picket