Dubstepforum.com

nowaysj wrote:Are you reading ohm? Your UI's are balls and you're loosing market share because of it. Hire a professional.

The truth right there...

Yes except it is supposed to be losing! It was the morning. My mind was looose.

Loose.

bouncingfish wrote:

nowaysj wrote:Are you reading ohm? Your UI's are balls and you're loosing market share because of it. Hire a professional.

The truth right there...

yeah i totally agree, trash in itself has a much nicer friendly design -- ohm still has some sexy sounds though.

How does ohm studio look in comparison? equally shit? i haven't really taken the time to look at it, perhaps i will do that today.

I haven't seen it in a while, but it looked way more restrained and conventional.

I pefer omh to trash I find trash I a bit hard to control some times, although I love the interface compared to ohm, but I use camelphat more often then not !

I prefer trash because it works on my system and ohmicide crashes logic far to much.Its been broken for years now so i gave up a long time ago with it.

not gotten deep into trash, but i've used ohmicide loads and have lots of banks of patches i made that i like to morph through. i think trash is probably more feature full and flexible, but i probably need to get my hands more dirty with it to understand the appeal.