Dubstepforum.com

danrev wrote:

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

why does this stuff even get leaked before conviction?

ask yourself that question

Hardly got leaked. Police announce they arrested an 82 year old man from berkshire in relation to Operation Yewtree. as I believe they're legally obliged to do, people got on google and found out that a famous 82 year old man who lives in Berkshire is Rolf Harris.

The assumption therefore is that the man who was arrested is Rolf Harris.

Plus theres already a healthy list of people who are keeping an eye on. So when/if they announce that a 72 year old man from Surrey has been arrested, I shall be making an informed guess at who it is.

In general though all these arrests are people that aren't that big a deal but were once.

Seems very fishy to me, where is the current big big name in media getting arrested for it?

It's maybe a form of smearing to stop them talking or maybe just giving the police someone from their fucked up circle.

oh yeah no doubt, I dont know if you follow a guy on twitter called Muruch Buruchunstur (or something similar) who posts up alot of old newspaper articles with regards to child sex rings in high places, police investigations being shut down and just generally upsetting stuff. Some of it you might have to take with a pinch of salt, but I have no qualms about accepting that there are people in high places that get away with this shit.

After all it's known the high up's in ancient Greece and ancient Rome fucked children so why would our civilisation be any different?

I bet the royals are at it

The royals dont need to be sex abusers for me to hate them, but it helps. I'd like to think that its more prevalent amongst those who SEEK power than those who are merely born into it though. Though no doubt that birthright feeling probably brings about some fucked up sense of worth.

Was reading on another forum a little meditation on what would happen if Winston Churchill was outed as a paedophile and abuser. He was a thoroughly nasty piece of work generally but his war efforts have made him a national hero and central to the British psyche, if it turned out that his sexual proclivities were as perverse would that be swept under the rug and collectively ignored like all the other aspects of his personality and policy? Interesting thought anyway.

danrev wrote:The royals dont need to be sex abusers for me to hate them, but it helps. I'd like to think that its more prevalent amongst those who SEEK power than those who are merely born into it though. Though no doubt that birthright feeling probably brings about some fucked up sense of worth.

Was reading on another forum a little meditation on what would happen if Winston Churchill was outed as a paedophile and abuser. He was a thoroughly nasty piece of work generally but his war efforts have made him a national hero and central to the British psyche, if it turned out that his sexual proclivities were as perverse would that be swept under the rug and collectively ignored like all the other aspects of his personality and policy? Interesting thought anyway.

It wouldn't be allowed I'd imagine, How come you think it's more prevalent amongst those SEEKING power just out of interest?

Americans tend to get child abusers mixed up with people obsessed with feet as well

Pedafile lol

Dunno if I'll be able to articulate this well after all day drinking but if you're a nasty bastard and you want to get away with it it's probably best to try and get yourself into a vantage point where you can best see threats coming and defend yourself. Be wary of the man who seeks power. Same reason so many violent types join the police.

People who are born into power and wealth tend to be dandies and fops who think everything is totally excellent because they've not been exposed to anything other than lickspittles and extravagance, while they may be nasty bastards due to the lack of restrictions on their character I just dont think they're as likely to have been vulnerable enough to be abused as children themselves, and therefore have the same disassociative behaviour as their abusers.

I mean this falls down if you believe that high society think children are 'the final taboo' or something and use their immunity as an excuse to indulge in this sort of behaviour, but I'm kinda wary of that idea. I dont think most people could rape a child just because they can.

danrev wrote:
I mean this falls down if you believe that high society think children are 'the final taboo' or something and use their immunity as an excuse to indulge in this sort of behaviour, but I'm kinda wary of that idea. I dont think most people could rape a child just because they can.

This, that's a pretty fucking wild assumption

tie me kangaroo down sport, keep me cockatoo cool, etc. obvious pervert tbh.

British Kids

sure can

Haha !

Negativalo with the Aussie hate

lloydy wrote:Also not mine but again....

Is it me, or as each day goes by is it getting harder to tell the difference between the queen's honours list and the sex offenders register?

You know, I had pretty much this exact thought watching the Olympics last year - Pete Townshend, George Michaels... was waiting for Gary Glitter to show up and make it a proper Pervopalooza.

Nevalo wrote:

Yep but not as butthurt as Rolfs victims would have been....

you're supposed to fill out the form, not chat shit you bumbahole.

^^^^
Nice reply - thanks for proving me right,

Anyway this story was doing the rounds on conspiracy sites back in november last year - old news,

At that time they were saying the 82 year old "entertainer" was suicidal and had been admitted to some sort of mental hospital,

Thats all i know bout this.

and still you think i take any of this seriously.