Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:34 pm
who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
The plural of Lego is....
Page 2 of 35
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:35 pm
Exactlyshowguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:36 pm
Anyway ZZ Top spelled it out in that song about the girl that's really good at sticking little bricks together.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:38 pm
fishes?Chu wrote:Exactlyshowguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:40 pm
leggings 
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:40 pm
mouses?showguns wrote:fishes?Chu wrote:Exactlyshowguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:43 pm
what's the plural of lego technix?
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:46 pm
go pick up your lego.. its lego trust me i am a vetren .. i played with it well up to i was 17 or so.. iactually still got soem models from 2002 that i made.. they broke but i plan to re build them.. at the time i took pictures of them and i have them in a desolate region of my attic..
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:47 pm
Legotex ?boomnoise wrote:what's the plural of lego technix?
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:47 pm
clearly is leggingsd.three wrote:leggings
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:39 pm
Racistsshowguns wrote:fishes?Chu wrote:Exactlyshowguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:07 pm
Lego 4 sure.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:10 pm
It's Lego because it is an uncountable noun. Like air, water or undergrowth.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:11 pm
i got heaps of lego.......... too easy
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:20 pm
i just found this. its from some dudes site that makes lego sculptures...not sure if its technically correct...
Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong).
Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong).
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:27 pm
Who cares...words like innit (isnt it) and shup (shut up) arent found in the dictionary but are still used to communicate.sri wrote:i just found this. its from some dudes site that makes lego sculptures...not sure if its technically correct...
Which is correct as the plural of LEGO: 'Lego' or 'Legos'? Neither, actually. The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces' or whatever (using LEGO as an adjective -- and one should really capitalize all of the letters, and put the little 'circle-R' symbol after it (®)). This is all a matter of protecting the trademark of 'LEGO' for the company (using it otherwise degenerates the strength of the trademark). This is not to say that I use the word correctly 100% of the time... but that's the answer to the question (it's always fun/painful to read the near-flame-wars that start at slashdot.org over this topic... and generally, both sides are wrong).
SO SHUP BOUT UR LEGO MAN OR IF UR FOREIGN THEN LEGGOS INNIT
I had the pirate boat but lost the instructions and was scared to break it just incase..
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:31 pm
Look man its just lego. 
Feck, i wonder what word comes up 2moro.
Feck, i wonder what word comes up 2moro.
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:20 am
fucking sizan its lego ..that what i have grown up with and thats what it is .. fuck the men in suits !
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:24 am
It sounds wrong because it is wrong.Vonboyage wrote:That sounds so wrong.perkalerk215 wrote: "go pick up your leggos!"
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:34 am
who cares what you have to say shonky you spammer!