Re: For the love of Albino
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:29 am
I far prefer Albino to Massive, way better for smooth sounds. Sounds fuller to me as well, Massive is clinical almost
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Albino is a work of art! Your missing a few things. It had FM, AM and to kill it individual unison per OCS.nowaysj wrote:Yeah both of those synths were fire, but also murky. Albino though... I wouldn't call advanced. It is a substractive architecture, so a few oscs, into a couple of filters, with a few envelopes and lfo's, followed by an fx section (that is actually pretty bad imo). Wrinkle is the oscs can do va or digital. There are a few little really powerful bonuses throughout the architecture, though, that make it really powerful, imo. Like some of the osc settings, filter types, and those really really good envelopes.
bassbum wrote:Your missing a few things. It had FM, AM and to kill it individual unison per OCS.nowaysj wrote:There are a few little really powerful bonuses throughout the architecture, though, that make it really powerful, imo. Like some of the osc settings
Allowpete bubonic wrote:@bassbum, did you just use 'woo boost' as an example of old Dubstep!?!!??
Not at all. It was a example of albino. I think every synth sound in the song came out of albino.pete bubonic wrote:I'm not a synthesis guy, but I love Albino. Still use it mainly for atmospherics rather than leads.
@bassbum, did you just use 'woo boost' as an example of old Dubstep!?!!??