Page 2 of 2
Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:44 am
by cloaked_up
skimpi wrote:yeah songs need to be sung and tracks need to be PULLED UP SELECTA!
ye
this question muct be coming from a euroean IMO
Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 8:33 am
by magma
A song has an overriding theme or message, usually conveyed by words and/or a melody, but not always.
A track can just say "DANCE!", but a song needs to at least tell you why.
Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:30 pm
by Gewze
To me, an instrumental can still be a song. just needs a particular style of creation whereas a track is just bars of music
Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:24 pm
by ultraspatial
not sure how i'd define a song tbh but a vocal tune =/= song imo. see any shit dnb/dubstep w/e tune with some random singer-songwriter found on soundcloud and extremely cheesy & vague lyrics or anything with an mc
Re: To you, is there a difference between a track and a song
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:10 pm
by therapist
I'm surprised most are so rigid on a song needing vocals. I'd just say a track can be a little loop/interlude bit of a music, but I wouldn't call that a song.