Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:40 am
by deapoh
I think people say 320 because thats the more common term for a high quality Mp3, where a lot of people, as you can see from this thread, don't know what v0 is. I didn't till now, but I did know about VBR (Variale Bit Rate), not that it was called v0 though.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:43 am
by rekordah
Cheers love, i'll give it a go.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:55 am
by scoz
v0 is the setting. they used to be something like --alt-preset standard which equates to a vbr file at around 190-220kbps and is v2 now I think and the previously mentioned --alt-preset insane which aren't very useful terms as there's a fair amount of scope to get them wrong.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:39 pm
by 4linehaiku
Yeah the number is just the quality. v0 is highest, v6 I think is the lowest. Never really investigated the lower end.
You should probably use the -V 0 --vbr-new setting as it's much faster than regular -V0.
I think the default program off the link I gave is a fairly intimidating command line tool, but there's some programs about that make it much easier.
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/13048
is good if you have a mac, not sure about PCs.
If you really want to get keen you should get EAC as well and rip your CDs properly before you start encoding them. Depends how anal you want to be.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:45 pm
by boy_arena
This threat is mezmorizing!

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:17 pm
by rob_booth
and to continue on from my post ... use foobar as your media player .. so easy to convert WAV to FLAC >> mp3 -v0- new
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:50 pm
by scoz
foobar is the best thing in the universe.
(ok maybe not but music player wise it is)
Re:
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:38 pm
by ratep
two oh one wrote:
No, vinyl s[ounds better.

test press plz!
Re: v0 vs 320
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 1:07 pm
by telefang
yeah man, gotta save those 500 kb, that adds up you know