Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:07 pm
ok i'm talking with him now, we should have this resolved soon. he was just looking out for blog spam, which is fair enough since link/blogspam is a major issue online.
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Who's deleting info @ Wikipedia?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:10 pm
You da man blackdown and rightly so that he should step off seeing as how you wrote it
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:23 pm
thanks martin
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:28 pm
so BD and GB were already back. i added Riddim again + SouthernSteppa which had also been deleted.
EDIT: got a note from GraemeL as well. seems everything is sorted out now. I don't mind checking the page periodcally for spam, etc.
EDIT: got a note from GraemeL as well. seems everything is sorted out now. I don't mind checking the page periodcally for spam, etc.
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:34 pm
ok looks like it's all sorted now. right some food then i'm off to FWD ... Roll London City
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:53 am
big up u lot 
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:41 am
nope. think dat word has a specific history in the UK, hence nuff ppl finding it offensive. I'm of the school of thought that there's no need to offend unless it's SO important u hav 2. not sure this ever caught on in NZ, mind.sapphic_beats wrote:well, i guess "bigger" has to be ditched from the english language too. and "like" as well. while we're at it, might as well get rid of "mop" and "setback" as well...but of course, if we get rid of "bag" and "say", then immature straight boys won't know how to insult each other anymore, right?peripheral wrote:goodpollywog wrote:must be censorship time of the month.Apparently after 10 or so complaints I have to change my name or face consequences because pollywog rhymes with gollywog
kinda ridiculous if you think about it now, isn't it?
nb - I'm fine with bigger...