Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:30 am
lol, nomination for new genre name. love it.hera wrote:drum & midrange
i do think the article is largely tongue in cheek
i do think the article is largely tongue in cheek
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
the guide's unbelievable definition of dubstep
Page 2 of 3
i do think the article is largely tongue in cheek
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:48 am
don't chat shit bout hummus or coriander, i'm serious.snufkin wrote:humous and coriander
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:55 am
actually i quite like this oneSlothrop wrote:"much appreciated by serious faced people who don't so much dance as let the bass buffet them."
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:17 am
The whole piece enraged me tbh lol
they need to step their contributor's game up.
Wasteman paper.
they need to step their contributor's game up.
Wasteman paper.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:26 am
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:05 pm
dob3r wrote:I can only speak for myself: the two best things in lifecaunter wrote:wat do you expect? how many gaurdian readers do you know that listen to dubstep?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:21 pm
I read The Guardian and I listen to dubstep all the time.dob3r wrote:I can only speak for myself: the two best things in lifecaunter wrote:wat do you expect? how many gaurdian readers do you know that listen to dubstep?
The Guide is cack though. It's written by the sort of people who choose music because they think it'll make them look "edgy" rather than because they like it.
Let's be honest - you don't buy a newspaper to find out about music. That's what the internet, Mary Anne Hobbs and your mates are for.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:26 pm
hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
fuck me sideways
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:54 pm
think it was a typo and they meant less drums and more bass in which case it would be a little bit more accurate
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:14 pm
Lol.. Loved by stern-faced men in puffa jackets..hahaha
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:59 pm
WHSUncle Bill wrote:I read The Guardian and I listen to dubstep all the time.dob3r wrote:I can only speak for myself: the two best things in lifecaunter wrote:wat do you expect? how many gaurdian readers do you know that listen to dubstep?
i hate most of the Grauniad's music coverage. insipid singer/songwriter pap and vacuous twats with Fashion Hair, mostly.
ok, time for a hummus break
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:04 pm
pk- wrote:hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
Its not unheard of.. just because something has slightly left wing liberal leaning unlike other more popular (but cheaper and with a fucklot less annoying preachy readers) rags doesnt mean that its the absolute truth.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:09 pm
could be worse, could've been the Mail.DanRev wrote:pk- wrote:hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
Its not unheard of.. just because something has slightly left wing liberal leaning unlike other more popular (but cheaper and with a fucklot less annoying preachy readers) rags doesnt mean that its the absolute truth.
"Dubstep emo suicide cult linked to immigrant house-price cancer crash"
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:20 pm
"Bass weight caused twelve year old grandmother to stab judge"rowett wrote:could be worse, could've been the Mail.DanRev wrote:pk- wrote:hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
Its not unheard of.. just because something has slightly left wing liberal leaning unlike other more popular (but cheaper and with a fucklot less annoying preachy readers) rags doesnt mean that its the absolute truth.
"Dubstep emo suicide cult linked to immigrant house-price cancer crash"
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:24 pm
Uncle Bill wrote:"Bass weight caused twelve year old grandmother to stab judge with a turkey twizzler"rowett wrote:could be worse, could've been the Mail.DanRev wrote:pk- wrote:hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
Its not unheard of.. just because something has slightly left wing liberal leaning unlike other more popular (but cheaper and with a fucklot less annoying preachy readers) rags doesnt mean that its the absolute truth.
"Dubstep emo suicide cult linked to immigrant house-price cancer crash"
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:33 pm
Bass killing the rainforest and eating all the lentils.
Sorry, wrong paper.
Sorry, wrong paper.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:02 pm
lol, when i read this i had a bit of a giggle at how ignorant the writers are of the genres they suppose to know so much about.
It was on the front page of the guide which was a bit odd.
whats more is that the article was entitled something like 'stuff to keep you ahead of the game for 5 minutes' or something meaning cool new things.
Yet they had an article on lolcats which have been around for years!
It was on the front page of the guide which was a bit odd.
whats more is that the article was entitled something like 'stuff to keep you ahead of the game for 5 minutes' or something meaning cool new things.
Yet they had an article on lolcats which have been around for years!
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:15 pm
rowett wrote:"Dubstep emo suicide cult linked to immigrant house-price cancer crash"
Uncle Bill wrote:"Bass weight caused twelve year old grandmother to stab judge"
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:20 pm
it's a shit paper that gets everything wrong was my pointDanRev wrote:pk- wrote:hang on, the guardian printed something that wasn't accurate?
fuck me sideways
Its not unheard of.. just because something has slightly left wing liberal leaning unlike other more popular (but cheaper and with a fucklot less annoying preachy readers) rags doesnt mean that its the absolute truth.
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:29 pm
I do read the Guradniad 
and the OMM is at least trying to be a better supplement than other broadsheets but it still does miss the mark by a country mile on lots of stuff
the BEST newspaper read is http://www.thestoolpigeon.co.uk/, that DOES actually give you some new info, rather than stuff you already know (better)
and the OMM is at least trying to be a better supplement than other broadsheets but it still does miss the mark by a country mile on lots of stuffthe BEST newspaper read is http://www.thestoolpigeon.co.uk/, that DOES actually give you some new info, rather than stuff you already know (better)