Page 2 of 4
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:48 pm
by mudda
LOL @ 'first big bass wibble wobble' and 'first biggo bass'. A creative use of words!
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:08 pm
by superisk
rekall wrote:microcosm
Baffled

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:14 pm
by joseph-j
Superisk wrote:rekall wrote:microcosm
Baffled

A small, representative system having analogies to a larger system in constitution, configuration, or development.
See? Rekall isn't the only one who can be wordy.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:38 pm
by rekall
occupational hazard; former college paper editor / writer / columnist, and oh yeah, programmer since age 11 (it's all grammar - music, too).
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:30 pm
by distinction
Button Stop Deck. 1....
Spin Back Deck. 1...
Fader Across To Deck. 2...
Button Start Deck. 2...

Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:56 pm
by juliun_c90
Ah look we got a responce....
you're certainly putting the 'ponce' into responce.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:59 pm
by corpsey
Just burn the vinyl now
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:01 am
by ufo over easy
If you can count to four this tune is as easy to mix as any other skream track..
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:13 am
by rekall
i was going on 20 hours awake w/ no sleep when i was sorting it out so you could say my brain was open to suggestion and there was no clear answer. the tune becomes 'obvious' if you pay attention only to the clap-snare and figure the 'one' backwards from there. or just wait and cue on the snare. additionally the percussion (hi hats and whatnot) right after the lfo sweep in the intro are intentionally (and quite nicely) misleading. anyway, i've over-explained my analysis already so i'll stop. i'm not an idiot i just question everything by default.
or you can just do what distinction suggests

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:17 am
by ufo over easy
Or you can just count the number of beats in a bar and mix it.
It's in 4/4 time, the intro has an even number of bars, you can just mix it normally man. Count...
I do it 25 minutes into this set if you want proof
http://www.lowerdepths.com/mixes/benufo ... degree.php
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:24 am
by rekall
killers about vs. traitor
cued three different ways
[1] -- using the first very first hi hat as the cue point
http://actualmusic.com/killersabouttraitor1.mp3
[2] -- using the very first bass drop as the cue point (i like the upbeat/downbeat shuffle this does)
http://actualmusic.com/killersabouttraitor2.mp3
[3] -- cueing on and matching both snares (sounds wrong if you ask me)
http://actualmusic.com/killersabouttraitor3.mp3
p.s. ben ufo -- how you done it in your mix sounds a bit like how i did it in [2].
there is no right/wrong way! only good/bad. ([3] in this case is bad.)
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:55 am
by grime
im actually having trouble working out where to drop the second track of my Brazillian rain forest cd vol 2.....is it at the first bird chirp or and the baboon howl?
london zoo have offered no definitive answers
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:00 am
by rekall
^ you've got jokes!

lmao
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 am
by seebs2000
grime wrote:im actually having trouble working out where to drop the second track of my Brazillian rain forest cd vol 2.....is it at the first bird chirp or and the baboon howl?
london zoo have offered no definitive answers
The problem here is you're mixing off the CD. If you buy the vinyl, you'll find the parakeet's call is a good point to drop the riddim.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:10 am
by rekall
semi-related: i had a hell of a time finding a good place to layer kraftwerk's "uranium" over a techno tune by nick wilson.
http://actualmusic.com/rekall_--_differential.txt
http://actualmusic.com/rekall_--_differential.mp3
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:39 pm
by ufo over easy
No, how you did it in [1] and [3] are the right ways, and that's how I did it in my mix. If you mix on any other beat of the bar you'll be thrown off during the drop.
In [2] you're mixing from the second beat of the bar instead of the first, and it sounds horrible. Can't you hear that melody synth line is out of time?
In both one and three you're mixing from the first beat of the bar, only you're concentrating more on where you're starting with the beats which is a huge mistake. Counting from the first hi hat and matching the snares amounts to the same thing in this case dude, but mixing like that is dangerous. It encourages lazyness. The only reason matching the snares works in this case is that the snare on both Traitor and Killers About lands on the fourth beat of the bar. It sounds like you don't understand the concept of tunes in 4/4, as what you're finding difficult is identifying the first beat of the bar. I'd recommend learning some music theory, it'll make things a lot easier

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:09 pm
by rekall
mixing off the hi hat encouraging laziness?
what the?
as for learning music theory i had a full year of it in school, played sax for a year, clarinet for two, and played bass with my band, covers and originals for two summers, and producing since '94 starting with .mod .mtm .xm trackers. i've also been on decks for five years.
you might say i've reached the point where i don't give a fuck and down to try anything, mix any genre with any other as long as i'm amused by it and strangers comment kindly in public and online as to what i'm doing.
and pointing out that the first snare lands on the 4th beat of the bar and not the 3rd just affirms my point that the tune is not utterly standard and thus open to interpretation. one man's "out of time" is another man's "pleasant syncopation."
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:21 pm
by ufo over easy
rekall wrote:one man's "out of time" is another man's "pleasant syncopation."
Until the tune drops a beat early and everything's messed up
You did ask for people opinions dude.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:24 pm
by rekall
UFO over easy wrote:rekall wrote:one man's "out of time" is another man's "pleasant syncopation."
Until the tune drops a beat early and everything's messed up
You did ask for people opinions dude.
actually no where did i ask, i started this as more of a monologue.
but thanks just the same for the comments.
(no thanks for the personal attacks suggesting along the lines that i'm just a noob.)
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:29 pm
by juliun_c90
(no thanks for the personal attacks suggesting along the lines that i'm just a noob.)
yeah- like its not entirely normal to devote this much time and effort to a subject like this.
rack off noob-bashers.