Dubstepforum.com

Brisance wrote: Most of people still don't, as long as the interface is functional. Its about the music not the paintjob of the piano, innit.

A butt ugly piano will propably sound crap. That's why (apart from synth1) I won't download any freeware synths that I don't like the interface off.

Also comparing the trackers from those days with say, ableton live, would be comparing a bucket and a stick with a drum kit in terms of functionality...

Although Fastracker 2 is what got me into producing in the first place



Yay progress!!

The_Dza88 wrote:Hate trackers

Here's a photo of you (minus the cumface) truly displaying your feelings on the matter....

I think they're tasty



Seriously though, in todays world, not having a decent skin/gui is fatal. We have good quality graphics processing facilities, so there is no excuse for unsightly GUIs.

If a program looks awful, I won't use it, even if it sounds great. Good GUI = faster workflow for me, and that is one of my most important considerations when making music. No one likes stuggling to figure shit out when they have a hot idea to get down!!!

Some programs are rendered unusable by wierd interfaces imo...

It should be about the music though!

Eops wrote:
One thing I love about ableton is the interface really makes sense - and colours - I love the pretty colours

thats because they understand no one wants visual puke on the screen

if im going to be staring at a screen for a long time it better be cool looking and customizable. theres no excuse for ugly daws that cost hundreds of dollars. if you are charging that much, make it look good.

ahright i get it, so that cubase is ONLY for midi'ing hardware sampler and stuff.

as for trackers, they look cool them old ones, onboard sound but what, only 4 polyphonic? it's a bit poor isn't it.

808_sustained_bassdrum wrote:ahright i get it, so that cubase is ONLY for midi'ing hardware sampler and stuff.

as for trackers, they look cool them old ones, onboard sound but what, only 4 polyphonic? it's a bit poor isn't it.

Kinda makes ya wonder what sort of technology is going to make kids say the same thing 20 yrs from now about the kit we are all using.

lol at people making comparisons of DAWs from 18 + years ago to today's.

Step Correct wrote:lol at people making comparisons of DAWs from 18 + years ago to today's.

I was gonna say....

That old screen shot of Cubase is cool! Im having that as mt desktop background.....

futures_untold wrote:

The_Dza88 wrote:Hate trackers

Here's a photo of you (minus the cumface) truly displaying your feelings on the matter....

I think they're tasty

NO

Heres the real old school electronic sequencing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6QsusDS_8A