Page 2 of 3

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:47 pm
by Genevieve
hurlingdervish wrote:more like designing a webpage than playing music imo
Only if you treat it as such. Renoise has helped tremendously in inspiring me musically.

Regardless, while Renoise is my favorite DAW, I don't think it's particularly innovative. It builds on where Fast Tracker left off, adding features that have become standard in sequencers that have until recently been neglected by trackers. It's mostly combining the best of both worlds more than it innovates........

I don't think there's an inherit advantage to using Renoise, though. I guess it's just a matter of what feels best to use.

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:56 pm
by hurlingdervish
Genevieve wrote:
hurlingdervish wrote:more like designing a webpage than playing music imo
Only if you treat it as such. Renoise has helped tremendously in inspiring me musically.

Regardless, while Renoise is my favorite DAW, I don't think it's particularly innovative. It builds on where Fast Tracker left off, adding features that have become standard in sequencers that have until recently been neglected by trackers. It's mostly combining the best of both worlds more than it innovates........

I don't think there's an inherit advantage to using Renoise, though. I guess it's just a matter of what feels best to use.
yea man i respect the program, its definitely the highest quality tracker i have seen, but its not really that innovative, just perfected what came before

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 4:00 pm
by notch
Deadly Habit wrote:ableton is raped by renoise if your not an idiot and a bit older and can use a tracker
Lets get something straight here.. NOTHING RAPES ABLETON.. Put the crack pipe down and join the darkside... :o

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:14 pm
by Brisance
You probably beat off to the ableton logo..

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:23 pm
by futures_untold
HAMvst

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:10 am
by glottis5

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:32 am
by notch
Brisance wrote:You probably beat off to the ableton logo..
Nah your mum's nude pics do the trick..
Anything else you'd like to prove wrong to me on here.. MR. i wouldn't resample..

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:17 am
by olio
http://highc.org/

this is pretty fun too

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:16 am
by xzazael
I agree with DubFiend

Synplant

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:25 am
by djelements
It's a tie between Renoise and Live for me.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:30 am
by norman swashbuckle
I think logic

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:11 am
by deadly_habit
back when fruity like 3 or 4
octamed
old cubase 5.1
nowadays just pref all do most same shit

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:59 am
by magma
Music creation - Ableton.

Music generally - Winamp. That shit changed the game.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:52 am
by sook
nowaysj wrote:How we got this far w/o reaktor?

You can do anything you want to with sound.
2nd that...
nothing compares to
the scope of reaktor...

*dribbles*

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:53 am
by deadly_habit
lol c64 fuck what was name first sid editing
dating myself

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:10 pm
by buzzy
The original 'Tracker' software for the Amiga.

Soundtracker
Noisetracker
Octamed

...all of them.

Which of course are the roots and origins of FL Studio.

Plenty of well known songs from the Rave era were made by people who embraced the do-it-yourself ethic and were creating top tunes which were homemade on their Ataris and Amigas.

Just like several of the current Dubstep acts started out by making up their own music from their bedrooms with FL Studio.

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:09 pm
by abs
Obviously Ableton Live!

And eJay

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:07 pm
by hurlingdervish
MTV music generator

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:14 pm
by jameshk
ACID