Page 12 of 12

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:07 am
by BLZDub
Image

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:33 am
by djelements
BLZDub wrote:Image
:O

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:13 pm
by dubluke
i love ham in the face and on my hands

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:23 pm
by d_three
Image
Seriously Cheaper!

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:05 am
by kidlogic
d.three wrote:Image
Seriously Cheaper!
An looook... ees only waaaaaafer theeen!

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am
by badger
i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:32 pm
by nfektd_kid
Image

lets not forget Ham Solo

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:59 pm
by badger
bump... just because

happy, ham filled, times :U:

Re:

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:19 pm
by kay
badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind
I think it's all in putting lots and lots and lots of folds of measly thin bits of ham. So you get folded-ham-layer-biting goodness.

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:21 pm
by badger
kay wrote:
badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind
I think it's all in putting lots and lots and lots of folds of measly thin bits of ham. So you get folded-ham-layer-biting goodness.
fuck layers

you need proper ham depth or you aren't feeling it properly

PS- i dont think i can ever post again :(

Posts: 12345 :U:

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:27 pm
by fractal
rereading this thread whilst listening to hackman's fist of ham :)

Re:

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:30 pm
by leebass
badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind
Because it doesn't actually contain much ham and so is pretty cheap, budget ham! I agree though, it doesn't even taste of ham, maybe it's to trick your brain into believing you're eating ham because it's pink and ham-textured, and so you can pretend you're eating a delicious ham sandwich when really it's just bread and a pink, watery, slippery, inferior, ham-textured substance.

Also, smoked ham or no ham.

Re:

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:53 am
by __________
dubluke wrote:an image of mecca edited to look like ham
seckle wrote:community discussion is critically important for issues as big and volatile as this.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The glory days of dsf