Page 12 of 16
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:29 pm
by quidz
deamonds wrote:Do you not think that all these shitty Drum & Waste producers are bringing there out of date, overworked, elements, that became stale in D&B to dubstep, and calling it Original??
Its like bringing D&B down a few BPM's to 140, slapping some swag jah rastafari sample on it, HARDEST snare & kick imaginable, generic albino wobble, and oh look, im dubstep, yar..
Basically, the majority of Dubstep sounds like slow Drum & Bass, but even more tearout
and shit...
oh and P.S, im not just saying D&B producers do this, even the original dubstep producers tunes are going this way....which is a shame, really, why am i even saying this, eveyrone knows it anyway
You need more
silkie in your life.
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:34 pm
by deamonds
well no, because I already have the album. You knew what I meant
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:57 pm
by quidz
Yeah i do know what you mean, and you knew what i meant..there are plenty of dope producers still staying well away from this style you speak of and plenty that can do it but make it totally funky and fresh.
Just support them and dont give a shit about the rest.
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:00 pm
by quidz
And by the way, i aint saying you dont cause i know you do..but im just reiterating the fact that theres always alternatives to the bullshit stuff nothing that can be done about the bullshit, if people wanna make wack music nothings gonna stop em.
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:10 pm
by deamonds
exactly, just when classic's such as the aformentioned tune get raped beyond belief, its a bit annoying..
but yes, what you said about leaving the shit to the shit, i usually do...
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:46 am
by mj cole
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:52 am
by surface_tension
MJ Cole wrote:
If this IS MJ Cole, let me be the first of many to beg you.. "don't do it"
in terms of allowing this remix to see the light of day.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:44 am
by aems
oh man, there will always be jump up, and there will always be tech and liquid regardless of the genre. this is a party record for big raves - smash, does exactly what its supposed to. please stop debating "this is ruining dubstep" its a waste arguement. dont like jump up? dont listen to jump up, dont like tech / progressive? dont listen to it. honestly not a week goes by when this arguement is brought up in dubstep, dnb, breaks etc etc etc etc - who cares?
fucking big up nero i say. filling dubstep raves, can't be a bad thing at all, regardless of what you think of the track.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:22 am
by chainsawclownstyle
Aems wrote:oh man, there will always be jump up, and there will always be tech and liquid regardless of the genre. this is a party record for big raves - smash, does exactly what its supposed to. please stop debating "this is ruining dubstep" its a waste arguement. dont like jump up? dont listen to jump up, dont like tech / progressive? dont listen to it. honestly not a week goes by when this arguement is brought up in dubstep, dnb, breaks etc etc etc etc - who cares?
fucking big up nero i say. filling dubstep raves, can't be a bad thing at all, regardless of what you think of the track.
really just a terrible tune. there are good ravey tunes that will smash the dance up. just adding a wubble and a soulful vocal doesn't mean it's a good tune. if anything you will piss more people off BECAUSE it's this tune they remixed.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:35 am
by rob sparx
Aems wrote:filling dubstep raves, can't be a bad thing at all, regardless of what you think of the track.
Yea I remember when a dubstep nights used to be a woman free zone but mabeye some of these trolls preferred it that way? This tune is getting some seriously good reactions on the road loads of ppl feel the need to tell me how much they like it after reading all the hate on this thread.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:41 am
by deamonds
rob mate, any girl who moshes to halfstep lfo raping, I do not want to know. End of.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:25 am
by steshine
I always thought the idea of underground/urban music was that it didn't have to meet all these targets and figures that pop music conforms to. This includes the number of people, more specifically girls, in a dance. Personally i go to a dance to hear the quality selection, feel the soundsystem, and enjoy the music. i couldn't care less if it's rammed full of girls or if it's empty. People make this music and go to hear this music out of the love for it and that's how it should be.
PS i still think this song is poor
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:33 am
by rob sparx
STOON wrote:i was under the impression that mid range wobble was what was driving away girls, the fitties anyway, but maybe rob prefers it that way
lol its all about the fatties wubbling it up on the dancefloor!
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:39 pm
by nero - dan
oooh booooo hooooo dubstep isn't what it used to be boooooo hoooo now when we go to raves we have to dance rather then just stand stoking our chins booooo hoooooo dnb producers boooooo hooooooooooo midrange bass booooo hoooooo wobble waaaaaaaahhhh
You're the dubstep equivalent of a bunch of daily mail readers!
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:46 pm
by the-voice-of-reason
[quote="NERO - Dan"] mail readers![/quote]
Your tunes are the musical equivalent of the daily mail.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:46 pm
by deamonds
and saying that people are chin strokers is the equivelent of wobble bashing..
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:47 pm
by deamonds
THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:NERO - Dan wrote: mail readers!
Your tunes are the musical equivalent of the daily mail.
haha
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:50 pm
by djdowee
THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:NERO - Dan wrote: mail readers!
Your tunes are the musical equivalent of the daily mail.
beat me to it!
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:58 pm
by hackman
lulz