Naan Bread wrote:@AllNightDayDream
What you recommend as the best starter/introduction to Marxism. I've always wanted to read into it but I'm never quite sure where to begin.
Well the manifesto gives you a fairly decent overview of what Marx's method arrived at for his own time. But in the totality of things, it's a bit shallow, and very much a time-sensitive piece. But you can see bits of vindication for him in it because a few of the policies he lays out in it are now commonplace in developed countries (graduated income tax, national bank, centralized communications & transport) because they were entirely legitimate criticisms of the system as it existed. But what lies underneath that Marx really brought to the table was his historical materialism, his no-bullshit analysis of history, that in many many ways stems from the philosophy of Hegel, his teacher in germany.
You can read him using such analysis in publications like
the 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon, and he's got at least 2 dozen articles on the american civil war, more on british politics of the time, crimean war, etc. He was a busy writer. Most if not all of his material can be found
here.
But if you want to dig deeper into how his method works and where it came from, you're going to have to dig into hegel. There's a lot of secondary works on him, which you should definitely read first if you ever decide to read hegel at all, because you have to get used to the terms he uses and what they mean. For the period of Marx's life before and up to the manifesto, he paid attention to philosophy and wrote commentary on it. He sympathized most with Hegel's views on history and his use of the
dialectic. Should you decide to make the jump into the philosophy of it, I'd suggest reading the
phenomenology of mind (or spirit, depending on translation) by Hegel and to bear with it. It's the first work and exposition of hegel, where he lays the starting point for his whole philosophy and the dialectic.
Once you get an understanding of hegel, you should read marx's criticisms of his works including
On the jewish question and ultimately
the german ideology, which is his thesis on german philosophy, its directions, its flaws, his main points of contention with hegel, and a fairly complete expression of marx's version of materialism. Don't try reading it unless you've got some hegel in you, or you won't understand what he's talking about. In a bare kind of way, marx takes hegel's thought and runs with it. A good way to express it is that Marx believed Hegel's philosophy to be accurate, but stuck in the clouds.
The holy grail of understanding Marx, however, is his
Capital: A critique of Political Economy where he gets into the nitty gritty and tirelessly lays out the material relations we live in, and exposes their contradictions and absurdities. I'm waiting to get a full background understanding before I finally dig in, but this was his life's work and he kept trying to finish it till he died. The first volume I hear is put together beautifully, especially if you get past the first 3 chapters which they say are the most difficult, where most people (including myself) give up. Volumes 2 and 3 however were never completely finished by Marx and are compilations of his notes, not presented as cleanly as the first volume.
EDIT: For a more analytical presentation of marx, read G.A. Cohen's
Karl Marx's Theory of History, as it is a bit more palpable. It's a slightly less marxist presentation of marxism. For a more involved work using his method, check out esteemed George Lukac's
History and Class Consciousness.
On another note, I asked a friend of mine who's big into literature if I should read Gravity's rainbow, and he told me I shouldn't since i'm not acquainted with fictional literature at all really, and wouldn't get most of the references he makes. So more non-fiction it is for me, then. Got this in the mail yesterday
