Dubstepforum.com

Pedro Sánchez wrote:

m8son wrote: he has quite a comprehensive 'about me' section

MICHAEL URBINA wrote:Welcome to my blog! I’m a Sociology and Women’s and Gender Studies Double Major. I will be using this blog to write about race/ethnicity, gender, masculinity, feminism, and men in feminism. My goal is to raise awareness, connect you (the reader) with some badass articles and videos, and provide resources for men interested in exploring

i only saw this one http://michaelurbina.com/about-me/

Hello everyone! My name is Michael Urbina.

fuck the list, read the comments hahahahaha

His Facebook page is pretty interesting as well;

https://www.facebook.com/michaelanthonyurbina

See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one

Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one

Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

wolf, get your male privilege in check please.

m8son wrote:

Yes, immaturity.

Also it's bit like folk believing a photograph will steal your soul

Riddles wrote:

wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one

Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

wolf, get your male privilege in check please.

innit typical cis behaviour

garethom wrote:re: that list Wub posted.

Recognize your privileges, especially your male privilege (and white privilege if applicable).

I understand what it is (or allegedly is, whatever), but what am I meant to do with that knowledge?

allegedly s: ??

white privilege is very very apparent, america for example

i guess its not so huge in the uk but its still pretty obvious

cant find the original 101 men allies to women article thing the link doesnt work ))))))))))=-:

found it

its pretty cringe tbh

im seeing a lot of "take the behaviour dictated by ur natural instincts and do the complete opposite"

im all for feminism but some off this stuff is just butt-gash

97. Appearances should never matter

OH COME ON!!! THATS JUS STUPID!!!

lol I got to the one where it told you to look down and cross the street in case of seeing a female

wolf89 wrote:See I know there's an awful lot of things there to talk about but I'm just gonna say I'm totally stumped by this one

Be conscious of where your eyes wander as a woman walks by. Change that behavior.

So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

Is that no the entire practicability of feminism though?

nothing

wolf89 wrote: So you're not allowed to look at an attractive woman at all ever because it's harassment? I mean I understand that having a massive unsubtle perv on someone is going to make someone uncomfortable but this isn't really saying that. So women don't look at men they find attractive? What about lesbians having a cheeky ogle? Is that still sexist? Are guys allowed to check out other guys if they're inclined to do so? I don't see how this is an issue about feminism. It's just about drawing the line between glancing at someone you like the look of vs an offensive obvious perving that makes someone uncomfortable. I mean I do realize what thread we're in can anyone still explain this point?

there's a strong chance I got it all wrong, but I think that is kinda their point: there are a couple of guys around who can't grasp the concept of mutual respect, and as it happens around 90% of them are heterosexual so they will be eyeballin' and disrespectin' women on a daily basis. and I wouldn't say they're wrong in stating women are far less likely to sexually harass men with their looks, purely because men aren't tought to beware of female approaches (here lies the main problem with modern feminism imho: trying to rid mankind of its last 6000 years of socio-cultural development is a bit naive).

basically, feminist agenda is (or was, some time ago) about educating poorly educated #lads.

bennyfroobs wrote:

garethom wrote:re: that list Wub posted.

Recognize your privileges, especially your male privilege (and white privilege if applicable).

I understand what it is (or allegedly is, whatever), but what am I meant to do with that knowledge?

allegedly s: ??

white privilege is very very apparent, america for example

i guess its not so huge in the uk but its still pretty obvious

Just commenting about it on a personal level bro and didn't wanna get into a debate about whether or not it exists when it wasn't important to the point I was making.

Anyway, according to the internet, this is Deadmau5' car...

fuck white privilege

garethom wrote: Anyway, according to the internet, this is Deadmau5' car...

if I were to spend deadmou5-$$$ I'd buy stuff a lot stupider than that though.