mason666 wrote:He looks like the saviour of British politics
Does that mean that Whales is included as a sort of bin for Ingerlols?
or get Bale, Williams and Ramsey in on the team?
I mean it could only relate to footie, right?
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 3:41 pm
by soronery
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 5:09 pm
by hubb
With ruined pants (on the sly) UKIP a straight face!
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:03 pm
by test_recordings
That Polish skwat is pretty jokes
Everyone's going to be diggin on his taste in Kraut
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:25 pm
by hubb
a pole will shoot you with his knife if you call kraut polish tho lol
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 1:43 pm
by Johnlenham
Labour I guess, Greens have some pretty far out there ideas
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 5:49 pm
by Lye_Form
I want to see a coalition between Tempa Ts party and UKIP
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 6:12 pm
by MaceFace
#erewahamtryinasay
Re: UK General Election 2015
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 7:55 pm
by Muncey
The amount of shit I've read today like: IF YOU'RE A WOMAN MAKE SURE YOU VOTE, PEOPLE SUFFERED SO YOU COULD.
No, they suffered so you had the RIGHT to CHOOSE to vote or not. Choosing to vote or choosing not to vote are basically equal in this context. Being guilt tripped into voting is almost the opposite to what people protested and suffered for.
Muncey wrote:The amount of shit I've read today like: IF YOU'RE A WOMAN MAKE SURE YOU VOTE, PEOPLE SUFFERED SO YOU COULD.
No, they suffered so you had the RIGHT to CHOOSE to vote or not. Choosing to vote or choosing not to vote are basically equal in this context. Being guilt tripped into voting is almost the opposite to what people protested and suffered for.
This is completely silly man. You can't be an adult in society and at the same time escape responsibility like that unless you're doing it politically. You can not respect politicians if you like, like most people. But it's more responsible to be a super selfserving anarchist or some other shit than taking an anti-position like that.
There's no purpose to a non position like that, except when it's used as levity in the sense of an undecided group.
When people can't read we decide they are either dyslexic or just haven't learned yet. They are never just non-readers. This is the same.