Dubstepforum.com

Fucking Pkay, ambassador to the entirety of the US Military.

Masses of conflicting stories are a great way to restore faith. NAAAAT.

They said he monitored the raid. Odds are they had radio relayed to their command and in turn relayed to the situation room.

The problem is there was an immediate demand for knowledge by the public, an immediate urge to share the knowledge, and that conflicted with military protocol

Any time you have shots fired in the field that result in a KIA you go through crazy fucking debriefings and knowledge gathering. So unofficial debriefings asking what happened were passed along and misinformation got through (example, osamas wife was not killed she was injured, osama was not armed, etc). I think once they got official debriefings done they found out all the ins and outs. If actual video existed they'd simply observe the video. That rarely happens in the field.

I think that plays into why the photos aren't released yet. They want to insure when this shit comes out the caption is 100% accurate as to remove all doubt in conspiracy. Something as simple as "he was dumped in the ocean at 3pm" when it was really 2pm could show doubt. People can easily find out where the ship was in the ocean, calculate the suns position, shadows cast blah blah blah and then you've got retards doing tower 7 type shit.

I think they're pumping the breaks on the release of info, milking it a bit, and all will be revealed. It's too important not to show the pics

or it never happened...

pkay wrote:. It's too important not to show the pics

kinda like when a plane flew into the Pentagon and they released the vid...

oh wait

but yeh i get what you're saying, i reckon they'll release pics soon enough also

though it wouldn't surprise if they never do

noam wrote:

pkay wrote:. It's too important not to show the pics

kinda like when a plane flew into the Pentagon and they released the vid...

oh wait

but yeh i get what you're saying, i reckon they'll release pics soon enough also

though it wouldn't surprise if they never do

There's video of the pentagon crash.... not sure what you're getting at there

Link?

cityzen wrote:Link?

been up for years

they didnt release any of the interior security videos as the pentagon is well the pentagon and releasing video of the interior of one of the most secure buildings in the world would be rather silly

you can find hundreds of videos on youtube of nuts picking this video apart. This was taken from a guard posts security cam that is designed to capture the license plate and photo of the passenger.... not designed to catch planes flying into buildings.

i cant see shit on that video, neither plane nor missile

i've seen extracts from that video before

what about all the other camera's from the area??

oh come on, cant we leave the 9/11 conspiracy theories out of this

not trying to de-rail the subject here but that pentagon video is fucking stupid

are they seriously telling us that at the motherfucking security entrance of the pentagon they have a webcam that records like .5 frames a second?

Sheff wrote:not trying to de-rail the subject here but that pentagon video is fucking stupid

are they seriously telling us that at the motherfucking security entrance of the pentagon they have a webcam that records like .5 frames a second?

It was 2001 but to humor you

entrance cams on military installations are designed to lock in frames to photograph vehicles and license plate numbers.

This is how most traffic cams work as well for running red lights. Constant video with higher FPS would require you to stop the film, rewind, find a clear frame and then identify the license plate.

as for other cameras in the area.... this is a military installation and one of the most secure buildings on the planet. It's likely that they purposely insured none of the nearby buildings (which really aren't nearby if you've been to the area) were filming the pentagon.... not to mention that it's illegal to film or photograph restricted areas in the US

ahh i see, makes sense then

Sheff wrote:ahh i see, makes sense then

i exited the military in 04 and our gate still used lower fps cameras. May have changed by now.... but back in 01, 1 megapixel cameras were a few hundred bucks but were the shit.

now I'm hearing they decided not to release the photos. My guess... saving it for the election. Let people doubt him call him out on it then drop it on them.

pkay wrote:now I'm hearing they decided not to release the photos. My guess... saving it for the election. Let people doubt him call him out on it then drop it on them.

Like his birth certificate!

Badman Juice wrote:

bagelator wrote:why would they bury his body at sea?

http://www.al-islam.org/laws/burial.html

624. If it is feared that an enemy may dig up the grave and exhume the dead body and amputate its ears or nose or other limbs, it should be lowered into sea, if possible, as stated in the foregoing rule

masterwork

such a yank. god bless him