Dubstepforum.com

nowaysj wrote: what are you going to do?

ehbrums1 wrote:.

nowaysj wrote:

ehbrums1 wrote:.

You get one per week, that's two so far this week. Your month's allotment is nearly up.

m8son wrote:is that really u noways?

ehbrums1 wrote:

jesslem wrote:

magma wrote:

jesslem wrote:Any government that chooses not to provide healthcare to its citizens is essentially declaring war on them.

Discuss.

No. I mean, it's fucking obvious, but...

Declaring war would imply a change in circumstance - the U.S., for example, have never had nationalised healthcare. Has their government been in a perpetual state of war with the people that elected it (and as such, tacitly agreed to no nationalised healthcare) since the Declaration of Independence? Did Britain only stop its war against itself after WW2? Were we fighting the Germans AND the British until 1945?

What a daft notion.

I don't know if you know this, but the US was not, and still isn't based on electoral democracy. In the beginning, the only individuals with the ability, let alone right, to vote were land owning white males. And considering that most of the 13 colonies had been largely divided up by the british before the revolution, and only realistically split further after the revolution between successful, and powerful, generals (who in many cases were already part of the land owning elite), could you not say that when they made the decisions which lead to the formation of a new state, set in on and around land that people were already living on, which is after all what constitutes an invasion, wouldn't you at least consider that they were, in essence at least, declaring war?

And to your questions, perhaps.

no i do not considered elections invasions, thats fucking stupid

RKM wrote:i love that gif ehbrums

RKM wrote:that gif is pure sunshine