Page 16 of 20
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:28 pm
by badger
everyone knows that spin is the secret behind a good leak
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:03 pm
by crackf
badger wrote:everyone knows that spin is the secret behind a good leak
and make sure your arm rubs past your ear to improve accuracy
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:26 pm
by deadly_habit
i want some izan ufo and atlantis documents damn it
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:28 pm
by nicenice
Apparently Assange said there is details of UFO's in the cables.
I am kind of hoping they do something to him so find out what's in the security file they released.
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:37 pm
by hackman
edit
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:41 pm
by hackman
badger wrote:hackman wrote:badger wrote:some of the stuff on that examiner site is mind-boggling... and the comments....
do you want to say why?
otherwise i place no value on your comment lol
the website is full of borderline paranoid ramblings and theories that are presented as indisputable facts when most of the time by their very nature they can't be proven. one of the comments said nothing other than "i know this to be true" - how the fuck did they manage that then? any of those theories may well be true but noone knows one way or the other other than very high up people (ie not some random posting on the comments of a website) so comments like that show the complete lack of any sensible judgement that you so often see amongst conspiracy theorists
the fuck are you talking about the comments?
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:42 pm
by hackman
badger wrote:back to my pointless life of aim-less dronery then eh?
twat
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:45 pm
by hackman
what's pissing me off the most is that you haven't even commented on any of the points raised in the link? you've commented on the comments, and you've brandished t he whole site as some paranoid conspiracy based website, which is COMPLETE BULLSHIT
but you've spectacularly avoided dealing with any of the points made in the article, bravo
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:48 pm
by nicenice
You know how Badger rolls though. Letting everything fly past him and only focusing on the things that'll make him wrong.
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:34 pm
by badger
hackman wrote:the fuck are you talking about the comments?
the comments under the stories. wasn't referring to ones on those links you posted but i followed some links and some of the other articles on that website had some ridiculous comments after the articles
hackman wrote:badger wrote:back to my pointless life of aim-less dronery then eh?
twat
that wasn't actually directed at you but nevermind, more people like alien pimp who combat any argument you make with that kind of remark
as for not making any comments about the content i'd already commented in my post above so i didn't really have anything to add. what i was taking issue with is the way that these subjects are so often presented as fact when they quite clearly aren't. the article you posted isn't actually too bad and says "whatever the truth" but some of the other stuff on the examiner wasn't so objective. that kind of reporting only serves to lose any credibility to what may be a real issue that people need to be aware of. an article like
this does far better in making people aware of a story and providing some for and against arguments so that people can make up their own mind rather than ramming "facts" down their throats and playing on people's fears
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:25 pm
by the acid never lies
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:27 pm
by Badman Juice
conspiracy theorists are mostly racists tbh.
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:39 pm
by hackman
badger wrote:hackman wrote:the fuck are you talking about the comments?
the comments under the stories. wasn't referring to ones on those links you posted but i followed some links and some of the other articles on that website had some ridiculous comments after the articles
hackman wrote:badger wrote:back to my pointless life of aim-less dronery then eh?
twat
that wasn't actually directed at you but nevermind, more people like alien pimp who combat any argument you make with that kind of remark
as for not making any comments about the content i'd already commented in my post above so i didn't really have anything to add. what i was taking issue with is the way that these subjects are so often presented as fact when they quite clearly aren't. the article you posted isn't actually too bad and says "whatever the truth" but some of the other stuff on the examiner wasn't so objective. that kind of reporting only serves to lose any credibility to what may be a real issue that people need to be aware of. an article like
this does far better in making people aware of a story and providing some for and against arguments so that people can make up their own mind rather than ramming "facts" down their throats and playing on people's fears
what's alien pimp gotta do with this? of course it was directed at me lol, it was with me you were having the discussion
and all that other stuff you are mentioning is completely detracting from the original point, which is, and always has been wikileaks
i'm not interested in the comments, or other articles on the site, or different approaches to "journalism"
the only point that is important here is that an ex fbi dude is saying wikileaks is false flag, which i think is very significant
it's funny how people avoid certain points when they conflict with their belief system
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:55 pm
by badger
it wasn't directed at you at all it was in response to j-one and it was a joke anyway
it doesn't conflict with my belief system in the slightest. my belief system is that people from all sides are doing shady things and i take it all with a pinch of salt but keep an open mind and bear all the various arguments in mind rather than instantly believing either the official government story or whatever the latest conspiracy is (again - not directed at you). both sides often have elements that are believable and some that aren't
j-one wrote:Nah man, they've got it all wrong... it's a false false flag...
you can just go in constant circles of questioning everything or you can get on with your life in the knowledge that shit things happen and that people are manipulating just about everything for all sorts of nefarious reasons. question everything; believe nothing - having an open mind is where it's at
anyway, moving on.....
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:15 pm
by 2manynoobs
badger wrote:
anyway, moving on.....
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:30 pm
by Sirius
I checked out that site.... & I reckon it was a big load of horseshit!
A site that makes up a whole lot of shit to make points, yet has no substance.
I read afew stories there too... waste of fuckin time!
!!chea
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:38 pm
by hackman
Sirius wrote:I checked out that site.... & I reckon it was a big load of horseshit!
A site that makes up a whole lot of shit to make points, yet has no substance.
I read afew stories there too... waste of fuckin time!
!!chea
for fuck sake
and can we get a word filter on chea?
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:08 am
by Sirius
ABOUT examiner.com
Examiner.com is the inside source for everything local. We are powered by Examiners, the largest pool of knowledgeable and passionate contributors in the world. Examiners provide unique and original content to enhance life in your local city wherever that may be.
read the stories written by Deborah Dupre... she takes excerps from news stories & then adds a whole lot of
info that doesnt pertain to the story to make her point.
!!CHEA
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:14 am
by AllNightDayDream
hackman wrote:Sirius wrote:I checked out that site.... & I reckon it was a big load of horseshit!
A site that makes up a whole lot of shit to make points, yet has no substance.
I read afew stories there too... waste of fuckin time!
!!chea
for fuck sake
and can we get a word filter on chea?
!!chno
Re: WikiLeaks
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:16 am
by hackman
FANTASTIC
as i have already said i'm not interested in debating how good a site the examiner is
more so the points raised in the article about the ex fbi agent
edit: upon checking it seems the link has been removed, maybe that's the source of all this confusion