Page 19 of 719
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:58 pm
by contakt
What? What's so funny? I don't get the joke. Why is that funny? I don't get it. His willy looks pretty normal to me.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:00 pm
by contakt
Oh yeah...it's because he hasn't got any pubes isn't it. He's shaved his pubes, yeah?
That's it, isn't it?
Yeah?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:07 pm
by hera
personally im quite fond of our mods.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:53 pm
by jackieboi
Now this isnt an opinion really, just something i have noticed - i may be wrong and if so please do tell me, but there really doesnt seem to be that many mixed race old people out there. Surely it cant have been that recent that we all decided that we fancied eachother and wanted to fuck.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:55 pm
by shonky
jackieboi wrote:Now this isnt an opinion really, just something i have noticed - i may be wrong and if so please do tell me, but there really doesnt seem to be that many mixed race old people out there. Surely it cant have been that recent that we all decided that we fancied eachother and wanted to fuck.
It was outlawed until 1984 in most western nations, and still is in parts of Somerset.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:57 pm
by shonky
Contakt wrote:
What? What's so funny? I don't get the joke. Why is that funny? I don't get it. His willy looks pretty normal to me.
He would't be able to say "lol" through such a big beard. It probably would have come out as "woof" which intriguingly is the noise of the animal you get if you reverse the word god.
Coincidence or not - you be the judge
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:19 pm
by *grand*
Shonky wrote:Contakt wrote:
What? What's so funny? I don't get the joke. Why is that funny? I don't get it. His willy looks pretty normal to me.
He would't be able to say "lol" through such a big beard. It probably would have come out as "woof" which intriguingly is the noise of the animal you get if you reverse the word god.
Coincidence or not - you be the judge
im going to walk with a bible now.. just so when i next see you i can throw it at your head.. who knows it might knock some sense into you.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:53 am
by shonky
*Grand* wrote:im going to walk with a bible now.. just so when i next see you i can throw it at your head.. who knows it might knock some sense into you.
Ooh a smiting - how Old Testament!
God's on my side by the way - not yours. At least I think that's what he said (fackin beard)
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:54 am
by stanton
*Grand* wrote:
im going to walk with a bible now.. just so when i next see you i can throw it at your head.. who knows it might knock some sense into you.
Ooh ooh! Smite me too!
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:44 am
by *grand*
tis a shame..
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:09 am
by BaronVon
Harry Potter is shite.Wasteman novel,read a proper book not designed for kids.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:36 am
by ikeaboy
Baron_von_Carlton wrote:Harry Potter is shite.Wasteman novel,read a proper book not designed for kids.
Never read them but people have said to me "I don't know what I'm going to do when I get to the end of the last book" Christ like there's no other books out there worth reading

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:46 am
by ikeaboy
People who'd rather be clubbed on the head at a protest rather than read up on what they're protesting about. People shouldn't be passionate about subjects if they can't back it up with an informed argument. Get a clue rather than hoping on a bandwagon or you'll give the subject a bad name with your woolly opinions.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:54 am
by forensix (mcr)
MC BUFFALO seems alot less tedious when we have the weasel and perkalerk
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:15 pm
by kins83
forensix (mcr) wrote:MC BUFFALO seems alot less tedious when we have the weasel and perkalerk

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:23 pm
by contakt
ikeaboy wrote:People who'd rather be clubbed on the head at a protest rather than read up on what they're protesting about. People shouldn't be passionate about subjects if they can't back it up with an informed argument. Get a clue rather than hoping on a bandwagon or you'll give the subject a bad name with your woolly opinions.
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. This kind of thing makes me very annoyed.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:27 pm
by frebentos
Baron_von_Carlton wrote:Harry Potter is shite.Wasteman novel,read a proper book not designed for kids.
my sentiments exactly...
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:32 pm
by ikeaboy
Contakt wrote:ikeaboy wrote:People who'd rather be clubbed on the head at a protest rather than read up on what they're protesting about. People shouldn't be passionate about subjects if they can't back it up with an informed argument. Get a clue rather than hoping on a bandwagon or you'll give the subject a bad name with your woolly opinions.
Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. This kind of thing makes me very annoyed.
Total respect for people who stand up for what they believe in, but blindly following other peoples opinions because you admire them or want to be like them is the basis for a lot of bad shit in the world.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:35 pm
by contakt
Absolutely. It is good to take an interest and take a position, but please make sure this is based on your own critical thought rather than what is the fashionable stance or the one you read most recently in the paper / on some conspiracy forum.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:01 pm
by stanton
You're right, that attitude angers me even more than the over or incorrect use of exclamation marks. Possibly.