Dubstepforum.com

exfox wrote: think he put the "video" tag before the "/quote" one, hence the forum transforming into another DEATH ROOM

lolllllll

dididub wrote:

bennyfroobs wrote:breen rabit bloom

yh these guys just produce grime

i kno its grime ^^ like i said i dont think '130' is a genre cos ppl clearly make different kinds of music

jsml wrote:
b2b quartz b2b maze temple ep

those are unreal ^


anyway...... zomby

2 hunna

back_beat wrote:wtf is 130, thought thats what everyone was calling house like 9 months ago fuckin labels

jsml wrote:"130" is chock full of mediocrity. A lot of it is utter crap.

that term was very much given it's name on here.
/
and that sound is not known off here. lulu

Swear down people act like there's an official naming ceremony or something.

Somebody started a thread, explained the sort of sound he was on about, everyone in that thread knew what the thread was about then.

Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...

no. ppl on here had labelled it under that term WAY before that 'appreciation' thread was made. way before.

garethom wrote:Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...

and that says everything about the level of beats then mate. everything.

TopManLurka wrote:and that sound is not known off here. lulu

http://www.residentadvisor.net/review-v ... x?id=13083
http://www.xlr8r.com/reviews/wen/commotion-ep
http://www.factmag.com/2013/07/25/strea ... e-gardens/
http://thequietus.com/articles/11825-ke ... oll-review
?

lol you just proved my point by posting four websites. ra reviews and interweb features. #progress in this internet game

bennyfroobs wrote:130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (excluding brostep, cos obv that doesnt count).

but wen bar 9 came in with shaolin style >>> wen when came in with a 130 remake of straight with some grime tags on it.

TopManLurka wrote:lol you just proved my point by posting four websites. ra reviews and interweb features. #progress in this internet game

bennyfroobs wrote:130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (excluding brostep, cos obv that doesnt count).

but wen bar 9 came in with shaolin style >>> wen when came in with a 130 remake of straight with some grime tags on it.

Spark it isn't original but it still bangs

We've had this argument before...

TopManLurka wrote:lol you just proved my point by posting four websites. ra reviews and interweb features. #progress in this internet game

you were saying that sound was not known off dsf. i proved you wrong by showing you various types of features over the last 12 months on artists that represent the sound, showing there's interest for the sound outside the borders of the forum. whether you like the site or not, being an xlr8r pick is quite a good look these days. period

dididub wrote:

TopManLurka wrote:lol you just proved my point by posting four websites. ra reviews and interweb features. #progress in this internet game

bennyfroobs wrote:130 > 90% of dubstep produced in the last 6 years (excluding brostep, cos obv that doesnt count).

but wen bar 9 came in with shaolin style >>> wen when came in with a 130 remake of straight with some grime tags on it.

Spark it isn't original but it still bangs

We've had this argument before...

(as xlx8r means so much to the poster above) how can something completely unoriginal be worthy of 'XLR8R Rating: 9/10'?
lol you think i care for these reviews after that rating?

/

don't come in with dead internet features and think you're proving some point plz. i'll counter it with the bad features like this joke of an article http://www.dummymag.com/features/essay- ... nderground

learn to use your brain
you're saying no one gives a shit about the sound outside here. i gave you signs that they were mentioned on websites that have hundreds of thousands of visitors. whether you like them or not is irrelevant - i don't. whether the articles are good is irrelevant. they've got people following them - and they happen to push this sound. hardly confined to the 130 appreciation thread innit
debate over lululu

exfox wrote:learn to use your brain
you're saying no one gives a shit about the sound outside here. i gave you signs that they were mentioned on websites that have hundreds of thousands of visitors. whether you like them or not is irrelevant - i don't. whether the articles are good is irrelevant. they've got people following them - and they happen to push this sound. hardly confined to the 130 appreciation thread innit
debate over

thanks for confirming

TopManLurka wrote:#progress in this internet game

made it from the internet.




we still on thereee.

TopManLurka wrote:

exfox wrote:learn to use your brain
you're saying no one gives a shit about the sound outside here. i gave you signs that they were mentioned on websites that have hundreds of thousands of visitors. whether you like them or not is irrelevant - i don't. whether the articles are good is irrelevant. they've got people following them - and they happen to push this sound. hardly confined to the 130 appreciation thread innit
debate over

thanks for confirming

hahaha

dididub wrote:

TopManLurka wrote:
but wen bar 9 came in with shaolin style >>> wen when came in with a 130 remake of straight with some grime tags on it.

Spark it isn't original but it still bangs

We've had this argument before...

can sum1 explain this to me

my cans are being shit when i play shaolin style it sounds like a crackly wanky mess of noise. doesnt sound like Spark It to me??

skimpi wrote:

TopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming

hahaha

hehueheh

lululululurka

shaolin style is doodoo

TopManLurka wrote:

garethom wrote:Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...

and that says everything about the level of beats then mate. everything.

sorry, but it says everything about the ppl discussing it

mIrReN wrote:

TopManLurka wrote:

garethom wrote:Folk more interested in slagging arbitrarily assigned names than discussing the tunes...

and that says everything about the level of beats then mate. everything.

sorry, but it says everything about the ppl discussing it

which is?

/

you know the bar has been dropped on the floor when ppl would rather talk about 'arbitrarily assigned names' rather than the actual beats that fall under said terms

I think its more a certain group of people that would rather just try and antagonise everyone else in the thread rather than join in the discussion about the tunes, nothing to do with the tunes themselves.

200 pages though

on it