Page 3 of 3

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:01 pm
by tripwire22
James Blake is awfully original if u ask me

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:30 pm
by deadly_habit
who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:43 pm
by ketamine
To me James Blake sounds like Jazz (and I hate Jazz, but somehow love JB). It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...

That's probably why it sounds like so many things, because his approach is purely classical, but the sound is modern.

Image

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:48 pm
by deadly_habit
ketamine wrote:To me James Blake sounds like Jazz (and I hate Jazz, but somehow love JB). It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...

That's probably why it sounds like so many things, because his approach is purely classical, but the sound is modern.

Image
yea with how many times i've listened to cmyk i def recognize the vox technique used on it and thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended. the other tracks you can tell is from old rnb, soul, and funk vinyl sampling plus some great use of compression and basic synth sounds and chords. it's def great stuff with just simple sub sine lines

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:55 pm
by nowaysj
ketamine wrote:and I hate Jazz
:o

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:01 am
by stappard
deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:02 am
by back2onett
ketamine wrote:It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...
Yeah I got that impression too but I don't think that's what sets him apart, surely there's quite a few classically trained musicians in the edm scene

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:05 am
by deadly_habit
stappard wrote:
deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that
it was in that free vst thread last week i think, free autotune and voice changer plugin
the techniques i just kinda learned from me working with acapella bits or my own vox. ie: free autotune shit i used a lil on my own vox in tune in sig

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:20 am
by stappard
deadly habit wrote:
stappard wrote:
deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that
it was in that free vst thread last week i think, free autotune and voice changer plugin
the techniques i just kinda learned from me working with acapella bits or my own vox. ie: free autotune shit i used a lil on my own vox in tune in sig

track in your sig is amazing! 8) nice one

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:36 am
by ketamine
deadly habit wrote:tune in sig
LOL I like the happy little notes that come in halfway through... what is that... guitar or piano? :lol:

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:45 am
by cloak and dagger
deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:49 am
by deadly_habit
cloak and dagger wrote:
deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.
same it's just weird when you know how it's done and don't wanna bite someone else

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:00 am
by cloak and dagger
deadly habit wrote:
cloak and dagger wrote:
deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.
same it's just weird when you know how it's done and don't wanna bite someone else

I don't follow you...surely it's pretty easy to understand how most music is done these days?

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:14 am
by crytek
nowaysj wrote:
ketamine wrote:and I hate Jazz
:o
Thought the same thing.


Anyhoo, first time listening this guy. Not bad. Even got the burial 'esk vox manipulation in there

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:18 am
by twentz


at 0:36... white noise sweeps and kicks... #james-blake-is-not-that-original #timbaland-created-dubstep

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:18 am
by cloak and dagger
twentz wrote:
at 0:36... white noise sweeps and kicks... #james-blake-is-not-that-original #timbaland-created-dubstep

plus I TOTALLY know how he made that...not so special IMO

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:23 am
by deadly_habit
:i:
@ketamine : neither, it's a synth

Re: James Blake has done it again

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:58 am
by netrik
James blake is amazing.