Re: Burial - Thief
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:21 pm
I have the WAV
pm if interested.
Loving the bassline in this.
pm if interested.
Loving the bassline in this.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
fractal wrote:dopocc wrote:Yah don't think Zomby would waste time to do a Burial - rip offabe wrote:incnic wrote: it is ZOMBY![]()
no it's not by zomby. i can tell from absolutely reliable source.
maryann3333 wrote:
November 04, 2010
i wanted to create a viral thing, a pirate thing. my thoughts were about how people are tricked by media day to day and how advertising does it, too. i swear that i won't use this as a promotional trick for my own music. i'm an audio amateur who started making music in 2006. at least burials music made me starting. i'm working at a little noncommercial radiostation in my hometown.
music and also underground music became such a nasty business. i remember when i was young and me and mates went to clubs, dancing, having nice times. no one ever cared about the who-is-who. no one cared about any producer. we listened to tunes. media started spotting the scene. more and more journalists were writing about producers, tunes and albums. what for? - profit.
can't do that. i would never release something by just craving for money.
i can understand the commercial issue when it's about manufacturing costs to release something on vinyl. yeah, i get that. - but i don't get it to pay money for ideas or knowledge or education.
this is fake. is it? - no, it's not. otherwise everything in art and music is faked, because it is emulated from your own cognition of existing art or music or nature itself.
call it the name burial, call it the name thief, call it the name fake. it remains a tune, a piece of music.
there are so many tunes out there, which just sound like fullfilling the plastic consumer needs our society creates.
my ambition to do this action was to post this statement. there are a lot of ways to publish music. - creative commons liscences, no rights reserved, copyleft music... pirate radio is hypocrisy, if it's followed by the sell out of cd's and tunes at the supermarket.
don't get me wrong, i'm not a hater of hyperdubs sucess. i appreciate the music, i also love the stuff by kode 9 darkstar and lv. but i hate music industries. profit haunting industries in general. and i really don't like forums, magazines and all thoose bubbles creating wrong attention on wrong things like it happend in this case.
burial mk2dopocc wrote:maryann3333 wrote:
November 04, 2010
i wanted to create a viral thing, a pirate thing. my thoughts were about how people are tricked by media day to day and how advertising does it, too. i swear that i won't use this as a promotional trick for my own music. i'm an audio amateur who started making music in 2006. at least burials music made me starting. i'm working at a little noncommercial radiostation in my hometown.
music and also underground music became such a nasty business. i remember when i was young and me and mates went to clubs, dancing, having nice times. no one ever cared about the who-is-who. no one cared about any producer. we listened to tunes. media started spotting the scene. more and more journalists were writing about producers, tunes and albums. what for? - profit.
can't do that. i would never release something by just craving for money.
i can understand the commercial issue when it's about manufacturing costs to release something on vinyl. yeah, i get that. - but i don't get it to pay money for ideas or knowledge or education.
this is fake. is it? - no, it's not. otherwise everything in art and music is faked, because it is emulated from your own cognition of existing art or music or nature itself.
call it the name burial, call it the name thief, call it the name fake. it remains a tune, a piece of music.
there are so many tunes out there, which just sound like fullfilling the plastic consumer needs our society creates.
my ambition to do this action was to post this statement. there are a lot of ways to publish music. - creative commons liscences, no rights reserved, copyleft music... pirate radio is hypocrisy, if it's followed by the sell out of cd's and tunes at the supermarket.
don't get me wrong, i'm not a hater of hyperdubs sucess. i appreciate the music, i also love the stuff by kode 9 darkstar and lv. but i hate music industries. profit haunting industries in general. and i really don't like forums, magazines and all thoose bubbles creating wrong attention on wrong things like it happend in this case.
Fucking commies!dopocc wrote:maryann3333 wrote:
November 04, 2010
i wanted to create a viral thing, a pirate thing. my thoughts were about how people are tricked by media day to day and how advertising does it, too. i swear that i won't use this as a promotional trick for my own music. i'm an audio amateur who started making music in 2006. at least burials music made me starting. i'm working at a little noncommercial radiostation in my hometown.
music and also underground music became such a nasty business. i remember when i was young and me and mates went to clubs, dancing, having nice times. no one ever cared about the who-is-who. no one cared about any producer. we listened to tunes. media started spotting the scene. more and more journalists were writing about producers, tunes and albums. what for? - profit.
can't do that. i would never release something by just craving for money.
i can understand the commercial issue when it's about manufacturing costs to release something on vinyl. yeah, i get that. - but i don't get it to pay money for ideas or knowledge or education.
this is fake. is it? - no, it's not. otherwise everything in art and music is faked, because it is emulated from your own cognition of existing art or music or nature itself.
call it the name burial, call it the name thief, call it the name fake. it remains a tune, a piece of music.
there are so many tunes out there, which just sound like fullfilling the plastic consumer needs our society creates.
my ambition to do this action was to post this statement. there are a lot of ways to publish music. - creative commons liscences, no rights reserved, copyleft music... pirate radio is hypocrisy, if it's followed by the sell out of cd's and tunes at the supermarket.
don't get me wrong, i'm not a hater of hyperdubs sucess. i appreciate the music, i also love the stuff by kode 9 darkstar and lv. but i hate music industries. profit haunting industries in general. and i really don't like forums, magazines and all thoose bubbles creating wrong attention on wrong things like it happend in this case.
Told you.Motorway to Roswell wrote:It could be someone who just wanted to make a tune in the style of Burial to see if people thought it was him or not.
so you've spectacularly missed the point then?FackOff wrote:dopocc wrote:burial mk2maryann3333 wrote:
not doubting his talent, that was said more as a joke than anything else.it was clever to release that tune with that video (like somebody did with gutted) to create the hype so big up whoever did it for that.but as i said it was more a joke than anything elsedamu wrote:so you've spectacularly missed the point then?FackOff wrote:dopocc wrote:burial mk2maryann3333 wrote:
an admirable attitude by a very talented producer. you have to question the motive behind so carefully following the sound of such a revered artist and spreading a viral video as someone who apparently doesn't like playign up to media. i'm surprised more people don't do exactly this kind of thing tho
And only his drum work slightly resembled burial. Other than that, the tune was to burial as some are to coki... Just a watered down version of someone elses original sound. @ the experiment: it only proves what we already know about the hype of a name or label, such as burial or pradasoultown wrote:he sounds like a ponce...
I think there's a difference between outright 'photocopying' of a sound and assimilation of technique.qwaycee_ wrote:i remember before i even bothered to register on this forum, there was a guy who posted somewhat actively who had a lot of burialesque tunes...he got torn a new asshole, was called a biter, dickrider etc and never posted again.
could it be him ?
can't recall his name though. he was pretty good at what he did, even if it was burialish in nature.
Something beginning with 'R'??? And yeah, wouldn't shut up about his tunes every time anyone mentioned Burial.qwaycee_ wrote:i remember before i even bothered to register on this forum, there was a guy who posted somewhat actively who had a lot of burialesque tunes...he got torn a new asshole, was called a biter, dickrider etc and never posted again.
could it be him?
can't recall his name though. he was pretty good at what he did, even if it was burialish in nature.
* well that quote is from "maryann"....
therapist wrote:Something beginning with 'R'??? And yeah, wouldn't shut up about his tunes every time anyone mentioned Burial.qwaycee_ wrote:i remember before i even bothered to register on this forum, there was a guy who posted somewhat actively who had a lot of burialesque tunes...he got torn a new asshole, was called a biter, dickrider etc and never posted again.
could it be him?
can't recall his name though. he was pretty good at what he did, even if it was burialish in nature.
* well that quote is from "maryann"....