worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
again, did the thread title say dear hackman? yes or no? i didn't even write the article, so while you're having your self absorbed tantrum, remember that this forum is for discussion. i haven't made this personal, you did.hackman wrote:if religions are like conspiracy theories
maybe this thread should be locked
we're not allowed to bash religion on here, why should seckle be allowed to mock other beliefs?
oh yeah cos he's king mod innit
hackman wrote:if religions are like conspiracy theories
maybe this thread should be locked
we're not allowed to bash religion on here, why should seckle be allowed to mock other beliefs?
oh yeah cos he's king mod innit
lol waht?seckle wrote:furthermore, that 3 year old religion rule that you're trying so badly to defend your opinion was agreed to by 8 moderators, so go back the square one with the accusations.
i think he's saying the lock came because making threads directly about religion is against the rules of the forum which were made three years ago and agreed upon by 8 moderators.hackman wrote:lol waht?seckle wrote:furthermore, that 3 year old religion rule that you're trying so badly to defend your opinion was agreed to by 8 moderators, so go back the square one with the accusations.
there's no doubting that the governments of the world are involved in so much darkness. the problem is the culture thats developed via the internet, of people getting absorbed in false or trumped up evidence. its a cult like culture, you know lead by example. i believe its true, and so do all these people so, hey, we're all in this together.HRKRT wrote:oh and as for conspiracy theories
questioning what is told to you is better than taking at face value. i think a lot of conspiracy theorists dont analyse evidence properly: but at least they are analysing evidence as oppose to taking everything that is handed to them by governements and the media and assuming it to be true. i think the whole wikileaks thing has opened a lot of peoples eyes in realising that the governments (whilst probably not being reptiles) do certainly cover a lot up.
noam wrote:i think he's saying the lock came because making threads directly about religion is against the rules of the forum which were made three years ago and agreed upon by 8 moderators.hackman wrote:lol waht?seckle wrote:furthermore, that 3 year old religion rule that you're trying so badly to defend your opinion was agreed to by 8 moderators, so go back the square one with the accusations.
making threads to do with theories regarding conspiracy theorists doesn't seem to break any of those rules...
that is all
danrev wrote:reistance to falsification is the killer imo
nothing wrong with questioning shit, i question stuff constantly, but i also question conspiracy theories and if I come across some proof that discredits that conspiracy theory then I acknowledge it, I dont work around it.
), but imo its better than getting sucked into believing something because one wants it to be true.danrev wrote: if I come across some proof that discredits that conspiracy theory then I acknowledge it, I dont work around it.
sheep on one side and sheep on the otherseckle wrote:there's no doubting that the governments of the world are involved in so much darkness. the problem is the culture thats developed via the internet, of people getting absorbed in false or trumped up evidence. its a cult like culture, you know lead by example. i believe its true, and so do all these people so, hey, we're all in this together.HRKRT wrote:oh and as for conspiracy theories
questioning what is told to you is better than taking at face value. i think a lot of conspiracy theorists dont analyse evidence properly: but at least they are analysing evidence as oppose to taking everything that is handed to them by governements and the media and assuming it to be true. i think the whole wikileaks thing has opened a lot of peoples eyes in realising that the governments (whilst probably not being reptiles) do certainly cover a lot up.
totally ridiculous, and as the article says, goes against logic.
yeh soz i been a moody bugger all day todayhackman wrote:noam wrote:i think he's saying the lock came because making threads directly about religion is against the rules of the forum which were made three years ago and agreed upon by 8 moderators.hackman wrote:lol waht?seckle wrote:furthermore, that 3 year old religion rule that you're trying so badly to defend your opinion was agreed to by 8 moderators, so go back the square one with the accusations.
making threads to do with theories regarding conspiracy theorists doesn't seem to break any of those rules...
that is all
well i understand that
i was making a joke of sorts, cos people were equating religion to conspiracy theories
the definition of paranoia is also closely associated with schizophrenia.Genevieve wrote:A lot of these 'symptoms' bear a striking resemblance to ones you would expect in mental disorders related to schizophrenia.
i'd agree with that generally, the original post is a bit of a obvious snipe though really. So many people have those traits its stupid to apply them to conspiracy theorists.seckle wrote:there's no doubting that the governments of the world are involved in so much darkness. the problem is the culture thats developed via the internet, of people getting absorbed in false or trumped up evidence. its a cult like culture, you know lead by example.