Re: Is originality dying?
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:52 pm
whats a dubstep i thought it was called dungeon now?nowaysj wrote:Ha, that's where you went wrong, dubstep doesn't exist.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
whats a dubstep i thought it was called dungeon now?nowaysj wrote:Ha, that's where you went wrong, dubstep doesn't exist.
i love you dudeTurnipish Thoughts wrote:The concept of air is in itself an internal abstract, as is the idea of weight. Nothing exists, in as much as we can comprehend, external to our subjective internal entirely abstract experience of reality. Everything is one big oscillating field of energy and the fallacy is the language i have used to describe the concept is also part of the illusion. No more than an aspect of an illusion used to express another aspect of the same thing.Hurtdeer wrote:dubstep is a construct, an illusion of the collective organisation of moving air in certain specific weightsnowaysj wrote:Ha, that's where you went wrong, dubstep doesn't exist.
there's never been anything original about moving air
except farting which is kind of funny
The same goes for originality, if all that exists is imagination and imagination is limitless, and if collective imagination is what we agree on as being the social construct of objective reality, (all-be-it restricted locally rather loosely by anthropological conditionality,) then imagination has free reign to reflect in upon itself and evolve there-in un-challenged by all but its own perception of self doubt. So of course, originality is never dying, not until there is no consciousness left to create its own experience.
innit. I think farts are funny too
tugglez wrote:I don't believe so, all the creative and original people will keep doing just that. The thing is, is that those type of people are the minority, while the average bedroom producer emulates other producers and confine themselves to strict dubstep standards and staying within the sounds they already know are popular.
I think the Koan Sound EP is a good example of taking dubstep 'outside the box'. Who cares if some elitists get mad because it isn't 140bpm, as long as it sounds good and more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
(First post, btw) I'm here to learn how to be just like skrillex!
tugglez wrote:
Koan Sound is more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
Koan sound is surely one of the more innovative on the heavy side. Don't get the fuss about Ramadan at all.legend4ry wrote:tugglez wrote:
Koan Sound is more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
Maybe you should listen to some Ramadanman or something if you want creative and innovative music. Not just someone who has the time and effort to resample more than others.
eskmo is alright. check out shlohmo. now that guy is way better than that eskmo man. not subjective either it's facttherapist wrote:Koan sound is surely one of the more innovative on the heavy side. Don't get the fuss about Ramadan at all.legend4ry wrote:tugglez wrote:
Koan Sound is more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
Maybe you should listen to some Ramadanman or something if you want creative and innovative music. Not just someone who has the time and effort to resample more than others.
I think if this 'originality' question is just about dubstep it's kind of flawed. Because it's dance music, it needs common sounds/themes, repetition etc. But Eskmo, Boxcutter, Amon Tobin, Gravity are doing some crazy interesting things with it.
I listened to this guy. I scrap about 30 ideas everyday that he would have pursued and "produced." Not saying he doesn't have talent, but your statement is extreme.legend4ry wrote:tugglez wrote:
Koan Sound is more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
Maybe you should listen to some Ramadanman or something if you want creative and innovative music. Not just someone who has the time and effort to resample more than others.
I think this is a crazy thought. If you think nothing is truly original then you're listening to the wrong artists. They spring up all the time and are usually the "first" of their kind in that particular style then they disappear, probably never heard of again. If you want to be original, stop listening to any kind of music and just let the music flow from your heart, to your fingers, to your daw, into your synths, drum machines.etc. You'll create something that is original and profoundly "you". However, if you start off by saying "I wanna make a dance tune" or "I want to create a really relaxing atmospheric track", you've already lost.ChadDub wrote:Nothing is truly original anymore, you just have to put your own touch to it. The easiest way to be original is to be you. It'll probably sound very different than what's popular, and that's good, because you could be the next big thing/style.
And thats why he is highly original because the stuff he does most of us wouldn't pursue and he makes it work magnificentlyVolento wrote:I listened to this guy. I scrap about 30 ideas everyday that he would have pursued and "produced." Not saying he doesn't have talent, but your statement is extreme.legend4ry wrote:tugglez wrote:
Koan Sound is more original then cookie cutter dubstep everyone else is doing.
Maybe you should listen to some Ramadanman or something if you want creative and innovative music. Not just someone who has the time and effort to resample more than others.