Re: Reaper anyone?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:42 pm
				
				they do....
			
..Well now im just curious as to what your doing on the internet!IELMusic94 wrote:because a lot of us do things on the internet that are less-than-legal. I'm sure some of you have things in your browser history that you'd like to keep between you and your ISP,

And the judge finds you guilty as charged on 1o counts of horrible sarcasmHircine wrote:thanks to you I know realize that all those classes that I took about digital crimes being analogous to normal crimes are total shit. So were all my ethics classes. Actually, I'm willing to drop out of law school and take classes with you instead.JTreeZY wrote:I'm just clicking buttons on the internet you fucking moron
eat an alpaca.

Yeah, in Americaehbrums1 wrote:Judge doesn't find you guilty the jury does...
And most other legal systemsJTreeZY wrote:Yeah, in Americaehbrums1 wrote:Judge doesn't find you guilty the jury does...
in what sense?twilitez wrote:So, whats cool about reaper?
I know the dev has his shit down and runs it pretty much alone, which is impressive, but can it stand up to the big guys?
Are too, are too!Nevalo wrote:native plugins work, but theyre not something one would use if they had the choice.
 
 I was also thinking of the compressor, the X-band compressor, and the EQ. It also comes with non-cockos plugins, like the master limiter, some bass filters, and a graphical waveshaper.Electric_Head wrote:I have a choice of various eqs, samplers, compressors, etc.
But I still use the stock Rea plugins.
They're simple to use and transparent as hell.
In England it is possible (though rare) for a criminal case to be heard by a judge alone, without a jury. See link.ehbrums1 wrote:And most other legal systemsJTreeZY wrote:Yeah, in Americaehbrums1 wrote:Judge doesn't find you guilty the jury does...
Earlier versions of Reaper were lacking some MIDI functionality, but we're talking many versions ago. It's all been more than sorted now.Electric_Head wrote:Where did you hear the midi is not as hot as the big players??safeandsound wrote:I use Reaper for simple playback tasks on my internet PC whilst casually checking it out. I hear MIDI is not as hot as the big players i.e. Logic and Cubase
these are the dons of the MIDI arena. It seems like it has a promising future ahead of it if it can sort out the MIDI editing, nice audio features and great software/business model/update philosophy.
cheers
I come from Cubase and I prefer Reaper.
It can and does. With Reaper, the focus is on having a tight, uber-functional platform that's highly configurable (you can not only make it look anyhow you want, including skins that emulate Logic, Cubase, Neve desks, trackers, you name it - you can also get "under the hood" and tweak internal params, as well as supporting scripting in Python and other scripting languages.) The sound engine is crystal clear too.Nevalo wrote:in what sense?twilitez wrote:So, whats cool about reaper?
I know the dev has his shit down and runs it pretty much alone, which is impressive, but can it stand up to the big guys?
its practically like every other daw, it just doesnt come with a selection of samples or plugins like most daws do.
 
 You tried so hard to make Reaper sound good there.alphacat wrote:
It can and does. With Reaper, the focus is on having a tight, uber-functional platform that's highly configurable (you can not only make it look anyhow you want, including skins that emulate Logic, Cubase, Neve desks, trackers, you name it - you can also get "under the hood" and tweak internal params, as well as supporting scripting in Python and other scripting languages.) The sound engine is crystal clear too.
The stock plugs in Reaper are bare bones in terms of fancy GUIs, but they're actually quite powerful and you can come up with some serious chains; the fact that they don't have fancy interfaces or animated realtime graphics means there's more processor & memory available for sound, which is what it should really be all about in case you forgot.
And honestly, there are so many good 3rd party plugs and samples out there both free and paid that I'm totally not bothered by Reaper not coming with them.
Again, we're talking about the most lightweight (6MB!) and yet simultaneously robust DAW that the world has ever seen. Just the signal routing options alone blow other DAWs out of the water.

I know. I sound gay for Reaper, don't I?OfficialDAPT wrote:You tried so hard to make Reaper sound good there.alphacat wrote:
It can and does. With Reaper, the focus is on having a tight, uber-functional platform that's highly configurable (you can not only make it look anyhow you want, including skins that emulate Logic, Cubase, Neve desks, trackers, you name it - you can also get "under the hood" and tweak internal params, as well as supporting scripting in Python and other scripting languages.) The sound engine is crystal clear too.
The stock plugs in Reaper are bare bones in terms of fancy GUIs, but they're actually quite powerful and you can come up with some serious chains; the fact that they don't have fancy interfaces or animated realtime graphics means there's more processor & memory available for sound, which is what it should really be all about in case you forgot.
And honestly, there are so many good 3rd party plugs and samples out there both free and paid that I'm totally not bothered by Reaper not coming with them.
Again, we're talking about the most lightweight (6MB!) and yet simultaneously robust DAW that the world has ever seen. Just the signal routing options alone blow other DAWs out of the water.
 
  
  
 