Page 3 of 4

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:59 pm
by Func
Func wrote:Mala - Alicia
KDJ - Soul Sounds
Bicep / Unknown - Make Love In Public Places
Updated

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:01 am
by Brewce
1. dmz 012 lean forward/learn
2. Massive Attack vs Burial ‎– Four Walls / Paradise Circus
3. alicia

...boring i know

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:21 am
by esfandyar
dont be jelly now..

Image
Image

someone had aphex's analog bubblebath 5 up on discogs for around 3000 us dollars not too long ago. isnt there anymore.

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:20 am
by Phigure
wololololol

Image

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:26 am
by Sexual_Chocolate
in no particular order:

dmz001
general lok - elmo riddim
that fucking house ep from 1991 with like 15 vinyls included

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:14 am
by BonerJams04
Phigure wrote:wololololol

Image
Image

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:17 am
by esfandyar
Phigure wrote:wololololol

Image
:U:

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:09 am
by QuentinisCue
The Burial x Massive Attack record is way overpriced, 1000 copies ain't rare at all...

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:05 pm
by garethom
It is way overpriced, but it's as rare as the amount of people that want it. 1000 copies is pretty rare if 10,000 want one.

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:09 pm
by Hibbie
It is a shame when a record becomes "rare"/over priced for reasons other than the quality of the tracks themselves

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:13 pm
by garethom
Hibbie wrote:It is a shame when a record becomes "rare"/over priced for reasons other than the quality of the tracks themselves
But that's completely subjective. :?

A record is going to be "overpriced" when there aren't many of them compared to how many people want it, same with anything really.

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:26 pm
by wub
  • Buy copy of Anti-War Dub.
  • Press up 500-1000 copies at an Eastern European pressing plant that doesn't give a shit about copyright
  • Sell one or two a month through a combination of eBay/Discogs/Gumtree/local free ads
  • Profit

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:33 pm
by Amber Trichome
dmz001/002
upsetters blackboard jungle RSD 2012 3x10lp
lots of warp records
lots of krautrock
lots of vintage heavy psych

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:35 pm
by Terpit
wub wrote:
  • Buy copy of Anti-War Dub.
  • Press up 500-1000 copies at an Eastern European pressing plant that doesn't give a shit about copyright
  • Sell one or two a month through a combination of eBay/Discogs/Gumtree/local free ads
  • Profit
Dont even need to buy a copy, youtube rip

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:57 pm
by rev
Nevalo wrote:
that fucking house ep from 1991 with like 15 vinyls included

are you talking bout this one ? (or yeah, that is from 88/89 or sumthin)

http://www.discogs.com/Various-The-Hist ... ease/57624

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:08 pm
by murky21
got a copy of the burial MA ting....havent played it once (since originally playing it)
lifes too short to listen to that record for 10/20 minutes
in retrospect i really dont think its all that...people (including) myself got sucked in by the magic...how many times do yall seriously play it?
anti war dub on the other hand, i batter as its a fucking huge record, fuck the condition im wheeling that all over the shop

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:13 pm
by garethom
murky21 wrote:got a copy of the burial MA ting....havent played it once...
lifes too short to listen to that record for 10/20 minutes
in retrospect i really dont think its all that...people (including) myself got sucked in by the magic...how many times do yall seriously play it?
anti war dub on the other hand, i batter as its a fucking huge record, fuck the condition im wheeling that all over the shop
Sell it then dude! Let somebody willing to pay ridiculous money to own it take it off your hands.

And you don't ever listen to records for 20 minutes? Why not man? You just a singles guy or something?

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:27 pm
by Hibbie
garethom wrote:
Hibbie wrote:It is a shame when a record becomes "rare"/over priced for reasons other than the quality of the tracks themselves
But that's completely subjective. :?

A record is going to be "overpriced" when there aren't many of them compared to how many people want it, same with anything really.
Yes but the reasons for wanting it; the music itself or to sell for profit
I think the point i was trying to make was quite obvious.

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:11 pm
by garethom
Hibbie wrote:
garethom wrote:
Hibbie wrote:It is a shame when a record becomes "rare"/over priced for reasons other than the quality of the tracks themselves
But that's completely subjective. :?

A record is going to be "overpriced" when there aren't many of them compared to how many people want it, same with anything really.
Yes but the reasons for wanting it; the music itself or to sell for profit
I think the point i was trying to make was quite obvious.
Well yeah, that's a fair point, your point obviously wasn't that obvious! :lol:

Re: Top 3 on Discogs Wantlist

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:29 pm
by Hibbie
garethom wrote:
Hibbie wrote:
garethom wrote:
Hibbie wrote:It is a shame when a record becomes "rare"/over priced for reasons other than the quality of the tracks themselves
But that's completely subjective. :?

A record is going to be "overpriced" when there aren't many of them compared to how many people want it, same with anything really.
Yes but the reasons for wanting it; the music itself or to sell for profit
I think the point i was trying to make was quite obvious.
Well yeah, that's a fair point, your point obviously wasn't that obvious! :lol:
It obviously was doe