Covers really should be this - people doing their own version of someone elses song.
...unless your an impersonator or something.
I doubt they did it for youtube views - the market for that kinda folk pop stuff is much bigger than burial. Did a quick search on youtube and his videos have between 400-800 thousand views, the archangel one has 40k.
I enjoyed it.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:31 am
by cryptical
are you in the band or something?
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:38 am
by Lye_Form
cryptical wrote:are you in the band or something?
Yeah i play the maracas.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:24 pm
by NinjaEdit
It sucked.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:31 pm
by ketamine
Lye Form wrote:
cryptical wrote:are you in the band or something?
Yeah i play the maracas.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:36 pm
by joeki
are you responsible for the cowbell in Rough Sleeper? If so, poor showing!
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:52 pm
by Lichee
Lye Form wrote:
Lichee wrote:
it's basically their song
Covers really should be this - people doing their own version of someone elses song.
...unless your an impersonator or something.
I doubt they did it for youtube views - the market for that kinda folk pop stuff is much bigger than burial. Did a quick search on youtube and his videos have between 400-800 thousand views, the archangel one has 40k.
I enjoyed it.
you've conveniently cut out the part where i explain myself. Of course covers should be their own, but in this case it's their song which they've lifted a few lyrics from archangel to look deeper and pull in a few more views because they're cool enough to cover Burial. I'm not sure if you can actually read or if this is all one big troll but archangel has nearly 3.5 million views. That's Archangel alone on one youtube upload.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:28 pm
by Lye_Form
Lichee wrote:
you've conveniently cut out the part where i explain myself. Of course covers should be their own, but in this case it's their song which they've lifted a few lyrics from archangel to look deeper and pull in a few more views because they're cool enough to cover Burial. I'm not sure if you can actually read or if this is all one big troll but archangel has nearly 3.5 million views. That's Archangel alone on one youtube upload.
brb covering "Baby" by justin bieber to get 800 million views.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:47 pm
by Lichee
ok you're definitely a troll or really retarded
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:26 pm
by Swamo
I really liked this cover (with a little bit of interpretive dance):
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:50 pm
by joeki
that's been reposted so many times. Quit reminding Sonika of one of his more embarrassing moments.
this has so far been the least disappointing archangel cover i've heard
She sounds completely out of tune - but that might be on purpose?
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:14 pm
by topmo3
yeah the lass aint that much of a singer and sounds like there are several vocals on top of each other.. but still prefer it to the others
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:37 am
by ketamine
Swamo wrote:I really liked this cover (with a little bit of interpretive dance):
Hands down best Archangel cover of all time. will never get old.
Re: Cover of Burial Archangel
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:25 am
by zerbaman
Lye Form wrote:
Lichee wrote:
it's basically their song
Covers really should be this - people doing their own version of someone elses song.
...unless your an impersonator or something.
I doubt they did it for youtube views - the market for that kinda folk pop stuff is much bigger than burial. Did a quick search on youtube and his videos have between 400-800 thousand views, the archangel one has 40k.