Dubstepforum.com

morgengabe wrote: Tbh, if you're so thirsty you could not touch your nuts, then who am I to assume what you would have done if you'd had the chance?

c'mon bitter fam. you can do better than that.

Nah, not at all, I guess I like to tread a fine line lol
It's interesting the perspectives you get if you trick someone into arguing with you.

butter_man wrote:

morgengabe wrote: Tbh, if you're so thirsty you could not touch your nuts, then who am I to assume what you would have done if you'd had the chance?

c'mon bitter fam. you can do better than that.

That's pretty serious though, I don't even know that you're not a rapist, but I understand that you confess to wanking. Shared behaviours and all...

who am I to knock your hobbies. anything to pass the time, ey?

morgengabe wrote:

butter_man wrote:

morgengabe wrote: Tbh, if you're so thirsty you could not touch your nuts, then who am I to assume what you would have done if you'd had the chance?

c'mon bitter fam. you can do better than that.

That's pretty serious though, I don't even know that you're not a rapist, but I understand that you confess to wanking. Shared behaviours and all...

haha, confessed to wanking. judge is looking at giving me 30.

c'mon freud you can do better than this.

I can't judge you for something I don't know that you did, so that really isn't what's happening here.

There's a typo there by the way, I meant to say "...couldn't not touch your nuts..."
If your lust consumes you in the comfort of your own home, why would expect it not to do so outside or in the presence of others? Why would I expect that you couldn't keep your hands off of anyone else if you couldn't keep them off yourself?

your telling me you've never wanked.

your a fucking pleb hahahahahhahahahahhahahahaha

I most certainly didn't say that.

It may seem like I'm being overly specific and gunning you personally, but if the statements stand up then you ought to assume the same of everyone else you encounter. Even your self.

no mate, your saying nothing.

just chatting shit about being consumed by lust. which I imaginbed is what you did when you wanked, right?

morgengabe wrote:I most certainly didn't say that.

It may seem like I'm being overly specific and gunning you personally, but if the statements stand up then you ought to assume the same of everyone else you encounter. Even your self.

they dont though.

If you weren't consumed, butter, why did you do it?

Because it is a little bit wasteful, isn't it? Takes long, rarely as good as the real thing, plus anyone who catches you doing it will mock you for the rest of your life.
Why did you subject yourself to it?

to what bud?

Assuming we're still discussing wanking as a precursor to rape, wanking.

Because you said you weren't consumed to do it, but then why did you?

where did I say that I wasnt or hadnt

You didn't, but you seemed offended earlier, before you said that I was chatting shit about being consumed by lust.

In fact, fuck it, I don't care if/why you wank. Why is it that my statements regarding lust consumption are bullshit? If not that, then why is it that people wank? I get the impression that you believe there is something meaningful about wanking, what is it?

Why would I expect that you couldn't keep your hands off of anyone else if you couldn't keep them off yourself?

is why, you fuckin pseudo-psychotherapist nonce burger.

maybe you should have done that second year in psychology after all.

all love though even though I got blocked by dr Gateaux halfway through our chat. can't blame others though can I, freud?

We're still on good terms, right?

Would you mind presenting your argument now?

what argument?

wait i had a bash yesterday am i in trouble

i couldn't control myself while revising and molested myself in a fit of passion : (