Page 3 of 4
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:38 pm
by John Locke
not read the loefah interview, so can only go on what the original poster quoted of it, but it seems to me nearly everyone responding on here has completely missed the point:
(according to the poster) Loefah didnt say silence was sound, he said it was an instrument. not the same thing at all. obviously silence is an absence of sound, but that doesnt mean it isnt an essential part of music, but whether that makes it an instrument or not is another matter of course...
and anyone that thinks that loefah's trying to look like a "deep thinker" by saying this either ...
a> doesnt know much about music: its not profound, its a very banal and obvious observation thats been made a million times before ("its not about when you play, its when you DONT play that matters")
or...
b> is trying to make himself look like a "shallow thinker"
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:50 pm
by utopian
If I sat in a silent room, I'd hear ringing. Fortunately, mine's extremely mild, but watch out for the tinnitus, folks.
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:43 am
by twitch
U cant play notes with silence.
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:57 am
by subbasshead
Is it not like saying black isnt a colour,
it is the absence of colour....
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:33 am
by suitcasepimp
I can't stand John Cage, I study sound art and design, and its always JOHN CAGE THIS, STOCKHAUSEN THAT... grrrr

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:01 pm
by Hide_One
i once thought i heard anti-sound, scary and a whole world different then silence.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 5:23 pm
by caeon
i don't think it's pure scientific science that loefah means, just the gaps and sustain between notes; it's the notes and the "silent" sustain after notes which give them their punch i think
about the "silence" and actual silence thing, i once listened to a constant tone in a recording and i didn't hear it after a while. so i think your brain ignores constant sound after a while and so then their could be silence in sound-sort of - that's probably why if you're in your house for a while you don't hear humming of electonics or w/e and it just sounds silent
another example if you type an essay to music your brain eventually stops concentrating on the music, you know it's still their but you forget about it
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:37 am
by somejerk
the anti-matter of music
Re: silence?
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:02 pm
by justin roche
"i was reading a loefah interview a while back and he was talking about how silence is an instrument...."
I wish my ex-wife had taken up that instrument, and played it on a regular basis.
Unfortunately, she took up the "Hysterical Scream" and the "tears of emotional blackmail manipulation" instead.
And played both of them almost everyday.
I do not miss being married to that one, I can tell you.
Now, silence is my best friend and if any one wants to play it.
Please, feel free!
Re: silence?
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:08 pm
by ELLFIVEDEE
Justin Roche wrote:Hysterical Scream
available in VST ?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:59 am
by Sharmaji
Kato! wrote:
As for music, was it not once said by a famous musician (can't remember who) that the notes you don't play are almost as important as the ones you do!
that was a big part of Miles Davis' thing. But in general, that's just taste-- there's the great story of miles hiring herbie hancock for a weeks worth of sessions. for 3 days, herbie didn't hear anything he should be playing on in the arrangements. He finally said this to miles, who then said something like "good... that's why i hired you!" the ability to know when to leave yr mark and when to shut up and let it go on is, you know... taste.
it's also one of the things that drew me to dubstep initially, and is still one of the best parts about the best tunes-- restraint, space, respect for the parts, efficiency in arrangment that leads to just tremendous effect. Pinch's 'war dub'? 'horror show'? huge in what's NOT there.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:09 am
by q_steppa
silence can be used as an instrument for sure.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:56 am
by auan
Ask a scientist, they'll tell you black's not a colour, black's the absence of colour. Ask a painter though, and they'll tell you of course black's a colour, they use it all the time, and if it's not, why does a pot of black paint cost anything?
Same thing with silence innit.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:29 pm
by rendr
Auan wrote:Ask a scientist, they'll tell you black's not a colour, black's the absence of colour. Ask a painter though, and they'll tell you of course black's a colour, they use it all the time, and if it's not, why does a pot of black paint cost anything?
Same thing with silence innit.
Don't get all deep and philosophical on me.
It makes my brain hurts!

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:55 pm
by dnab
twitch wrote:True silence is in a vacum
As long as there's air - theres a good chance of sound.
I wonder what yould happen if you were in a vacuum, you wouldn't be able to hear your blood pumping and it would be interesting to find out if your mind really did start to make up noise... although if you were in a vaccum you'd probably be dead

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:26 pm
by auan
Yeah you would, the sound of your heart pumping would reverberate through your bones up your neck to your ears and you'd hear it.
That is, if your blood wasn't being sucked out of your ears at the time. Then I doubt you'd hear anything.
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 1:58 pm
by paradigm_x
Yeah, but you could then argue that its not a sound as its not 'heard'
Its a different form of stimulation.
Sound is defined as fluctuations in air pressure. Hence no air = no sound.
Hi Alan!

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:51 pm
by drwurst
theres a lot you can hear even without you ears ( through bones and body)...
even "the sound of silence"...
and theres nothing so special about an anechoic chamber...
in a normal room that is isolated
(and silent )
you d have the same feelings
cause no sound, theres no reverbration
...
?