Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:35 pm
is it ok if i am a big hall and oates fan? 
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Even if it has a sick beat and catchy lyrics? I think it's possible to like something aesthetically without agreeing with it's message or meaning.Parson wrote:what if you like government propaganda that makes you feel like joining the army? certainly that could be argued to be bad?
all music/art can be imbued with meaning/purpose. when that purpose is bad, the art could be argued to be fundamentally bad.
lolBlizzardMusic wrote:Fedde Le Grand rule!
LET ME THINK ABOUT IT..
DU DU DU DU DUM DUM DUM
but can you really avoid its intent/influence? even if you're aware of it?selector.dub.u wrote:Even if it has a sick beat anc catchy lyrics? I think it's possible to like something aesthetically without agreeing with it's message or meaning.Parson wrote:what if you like government propaganda that makes you feel like joining the army? certainly that could be argued to be bad?
all music/art can be imbued with meaning/purpose. when that purpose is bad, the art could be argued to be fundamentally bad.

Sure you can avoid it's influence. At least I can. I have free will and power over my thoughts and behavior and I can choose to reject ideas that I don't agree with. Art/music can at times serves the purpose of communicating ideas that would otherwise remain hidden and taboo in our culture/religio/poltical systems. Art and music are not necessarily a call to action.Parson wrote:but can you really avoid its intent/influence? even if you're aware of it?selector.dub.u wrote:Even if it has a sick beat anc catchy lyrics? I think it's possible to like something aesthetically without agreeing with it's message or meaning.Parson wrote:what if you like government propaganda that makes you feel like joining the army? certainly that could be argued to be bad?
all music/art can be imbued with meaning/purpose. when that purpose is bad, the art could be argued to be fundamentally bad.
like lets talk about last fm. i've been pretty anti-last fm since the get go. i don't like putting spyware on my computer.
then at sxsw last fm gives me a big page of stickers with genre names on them, and we stick them all over ourselves. my crotch said HARD ROCK. or something like that. my ass said SINGER SONGWRITER. i was joking about how now we're all going to go home and sign up for last fm.
i really did not intend on signing up for last fm.
but then last week i fucking signed up for last fm. now i check it like 20 times a day. i scrobble every thing. come check out my awesome music taste http://www.last.fm/user/chrisparson/
you can see this girl has FUNK on her sunglasses
JUSS SAYINselector.dub.u wrote:Sure you can avoid it's influence. At least I can. I have free will and power over my thoughts and behavior and I can choose to reject ideas that I don't agree with. Art/music can at times serves the purpose of communicating ideas that would otherwise remain hidden and taboo in our culture/religio/poltical systems. Art and music are not necessarily a call to action.Parson wrote:but can you really avoid its intent/influence? even if you're aware of it?selector.dub.u wrote:Even if it has a sick beat anc catchy lyrics? I think it's possible to like something aesthetically without agreeing with it's message or meaning.Parson wrote:what if you like government propaganda that makes you feel like joining the army? certainly that could be argued to be bad?
all music/art can be imbued with meaning/purpose. when that purpose is bad, the art could be argued to be fundamentally bad.
like lets talk about last fm. i've been pretty anti-last fm since the get go. i don't like putting spyware on my computer.
then at sxsw last fm gives me a big page of stickers with genre names on them, and we stick them all over ourselves. my crotch said HARD ROCK. or something like that. my ass said SINGER SONGWRITER. i was joking about how now we're all going to go home and sign up for last fm.
i really did not intend on signing up for last fm.
but then last week i fucking signed up for last fm. now i check it like 20 times a day. i scrobble every thing. come check out my awesome music taste http://www.last.fm/user/chrisparson/
you can see this girl has FUNK on her sunglasses
As far as last fm goes.... You can turn it off anytime you like.
http://www.last.fm/user/selector-dub-u/
fair enough...i just think of stuff with kitsch value or whatever as being bad in the sense it didn't achieve its intended goal if that makes any sense....like top gun....i enjoy watching it but not for the reasons you were supposed to enjoy it from the makers points of view..its the same with Happy hardcore..bonkers 1 is ridiculous....but i think what i like about it isnt what was intended.....with someone like shitmat i think its funny as well but its LESS funny to me because he wanted it to be funny in that wayboomnoise wrote:if you like something can it really be bad? i also like some happy hardcore - i don't think it's the most intelligent credible music in the world. but i certainly don't have that criteria set up to decide whether or not i like something.Piston wrote:so you don't like anything that on another level you see as being quite badboomnoise wrote:it really perplexes me why people don't feel comfortable with liking pop records.
its not because its pop music...i feel the same way about happy hardcore
i love timbalands production
its usually the other way around and most people are only comfortable liking pop songs...i guess some people are understandably guilty of wishing to distance themselves from that way of thinking so they do the reverse.
i just like having a variety of stuff to listen to is all
if i like something i don't think it's bad. you can bring in other things like it being cheesy, base, dumb or whatever, but if i like it i think it's good.
liking someone's production but not liking the vocal is a different issue i reckon.
you can perhaps think something lacks the values of something else but to what extent is this judgment your own and to what extent are you being influenced by other factors?
But the beauty of art is that it has many different interpretations to many different people, the idea that the interpretation of the art should be shaped by the artists intention is illogicalPiston wrote:fair enough...i just think of stuff with kitsch value or whatever as being bad in the sense it didn't achieve its intended goal if that makes any sense....like top gun....i enjoy watching it but not for the reasons you were supposed to enjoy it from the makers points of view..its the same with Happy hardcore..bonkers 1 is ridiculous....but i think what i like about it isnt what was intended.....with someone like shitmat i think its funny as well but its LESS funny to me because he wanted it to be funny in that wayboomnoise wrote:if you like something can it really be bad? i also like some happy hardcore - i don't think it's the most intelligent credible music in the world. but i certainly don't have that criteria set up to decide whether or not i like something.Piston wrote:so you don't like anything that on another level you see as being quite badboomnoise wrote:it really perplexes me why people don't feel comfortable with liking pop records.
its not because its pop music...i feel the same way about happy hardcore
i love timbalands production
its usually the other way around and most people are only comfortable liking pop songs...i guess some people are understandably guilty of wishing to distance themselves from that way of thinking so they do the reverse.
i just like having a variety of stuff to listen to is all
if i like something i don't think it's bad. you can bring in other things like it being cheesy, base, dumb or whatever, but if i like it i think it's good.
liking someone's production but not liking the vocal is a different issue i reckon.
you can perhaps think something lacks the values of something else but to what extent is this judgment your own and to what extent are you being influenced by other factors?
with timbaland i suppose its different though..same for ayo technology...i do respect the production hugely but its more the image they want to project that i suppose keeps me from fully embracing its identity
thats as honest as i can be
) yeah fair enough..i mean that in a sense is why i like the tunes at all...but i still think somebody thats intended what they've actually achieved (fair play i don't KNOW what they intended but ive got a good idea it wasn't what i like about it) should get more respect than someone thats made something hilarious...like speak the hungarian rapper for example!..but i still often get more enjoyment from the latter!Jubscarz wrote:But the beauty of art is that it has many different interpretations to many different people, the idea that the interpretation of the art should be shaped by the artists intention is illogicalPiston wrote:fair enough...i just think of stuff with kitsch value or whatever as being bad in the sense it didn't achieve its intended goal if that makes any sense....like top gun....i enjoy watching it but not for the reasons you were supposed to enjoy it from the makers points of view..its the same with Happy hardcore..bonkers 1 is ridiculous....but i think what i like about it isnt what was intended.....with someone like shitmat i think its funny as well but its LESS funny to me because he wanted it to be funny in that wayboomnoise wrote:if you like something can it really be bad? i also like some happy hardcore - i don't think it's the most intelligent credible music in the world. but i certainly don't have that criteria set up to decide whether or not i like something.Piston wrote:so you don't like anything that on another level you see as being quite badboomnoise wrote:it really perplexes me why people don't feel comfortable with liking pop records.
its not because its pop music...i feel the same way about happy hardcore
i love timbalands production
its usually the other way around and most people are only comfortable liking pop songs...i guess some people are understandably guilty of wishing to distance themselves from that way of thinking so they do the reverse.
i just like having a variety of stuff to listen to is all
if i like something i don't think it's bad. you can bring in other things like it being cheesy, base, dumb or whatever, but if i like it i think it's good.
liking someone's production but not liking the vocal is a different issue i reckon.
you can perhaps think something lacks the values of something else but to what extent is this judgment your own and to what extent are you being influenced by other factors?
with timbaland i suppose its different though..same for ayo technology...i do respect the production hugely but its more the image they want to project that i suppose keeps me from fully embracing its identity
thats as honest as i can be
()
not only because it assumes the artist's intention but also because it negates the way in which each person can experience different emotions from another in response to art.
Don't underestimate the power of having to pay the rent.Parson wrote:don't underestimate the power of intent
its got wicked production mannesslei wrote:ayo technology by justin and timbas!!
WTF?! i can't get that shit outta my head whenever i hear it
"your hips, your thighs, you got me hypnotised"Piston wrote:its got wicked production mannesslei wrote:ayo technology by justin and timbas!!
WTF?! i can't get that shit outta my head whenever i hear it
maybe its from somewhere else i dunno
and the vocals are nonsense but they sound good on top imo
BUSINESSPiston wrote:like speak the hungarian rapper for example!