Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:13 pm
Voted... well deserved IMO
Big up
Big up
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Jolly Wailer wrote:the anti-rewind party poopers are starting to get on my tits - to rewind or not to rewind? wtf cares? those stickers are on some proper geek shit.
maybe "best DJ" has more to do with consistency, presence in music, big bookings and general popularity for a year's time than some quantifiable level of technical skill - if a magazine is giving the award obviously its judged on a set of criteria that is different than DMC or wherever DJs get together to pat each other on the back.
big up everyone who's steady entertaining the common folk.
It's not being snobbish at all. I just think that the BEST DJ should get the best dj award. I am sure there are plenty of djs who have just as good of selection, better mixing and great technacality. maybe they should get the awrad. LOL and to me "good enough" does not equal THE BEST!spiderman wrote:
lol come on man, that just sounds snobbish.
he is a good dj. he mite not be the BEST technically, but his selection is sick and his mixing is good.
i could sit and nit pick and name dj's who are better mixers, but he is good enough of an all round dj. he deserves the award.
lol@people becoming aggravated at these awardsdjsence wrote:It's not being snobbish at all. I just think that the BEST DJ should get the best dj award. I am sure there are plenty of djs who have just as good of selection, better mixing and great technacality. maybe they should get the awrad. LOL and to me "good enough" does not equal THE BEST!spiderman wrote:
lol come on man, that just sounds snobbish.
he is a good dj. he mite not be the BEST technically, but his selection is sick and his mixing is good.
i could sit and nit pick and name dj's who are better mixers, but he is good enough of an all round dj. he deserves the award.
I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
not in England but in the US, yea.ratdeal wrote:I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
have u ever been to a dubstep night???
It was actually 3 timesdjsence wrote:Jolly Wailer wrote:the anti-rewind party poopers are starting to get on my tits - to rewind or not to rewind? wtf cares? those stickers are on some proper geek shit.
maybe "best DJ" has more to do with consistency, presence in music, big bookings and general popularity for a year's time than some quantifiable level of technical skill - if a magazine is giving the award obviously its judged on a set of criteria that is different than DMC or wherever DJs get together to pat each other on the back.
big up everyone who's steady entertaining the common folk.
I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
An Again!djsence wrote:not in England but in the US, yea.ratdeal wrote:I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
have u ever been to a dubstep night???
Why do djs usually rewind multiple songs in a row over there?
it's ok. I heard you were a bit tipsyskream wrote:It was actually 3 timesdjsence wrote:Jolly Wailer wrote:the anti-rewind party poopers are starting to get on my tits - to rewind or not to rewind? wtf cares? those stickers are on some proper geek shit.
maybe "best DJ" has more to do with consistency, presence in music, big bookings and general popularity for a year's time than some quantifiable level of technical skill - if a magazine is giving the award obviously its judged on a set of criteria that is different than DMC or wherever DJs get together to pat each other on the back.
big up everyone who's steady entertaining the common folk.
I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
If your talking about my show in seattle then u r correct.....djsence wrote:it's ok. I heard you were a bit tipsyskream wrote:It was actually 3 timesdjsence wrote:Jolly Wailer wrote:the anti-rewind party poopers are starting to get on my tits - to rewind or not to rewind? wtf cares? those stickers are on some proper geek shit.
maybe "best DJ" has more to do with consistency, presence in music, big bookings and general popularity for a year's time than some quantifiable level of technical skill - if a magazine is giving the award obviously its judged on a set of criteria that is different than DMC or wherever DJs get together to pat each other on the back.
big up everyone who's steady entertaining the common folk.
I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. Awards are validation that some people who read some mag or something clicked some button on some website somewhere or something. If we can't hold values like that sacred then what the fuck are we? ANIMALS THATS WHAT! If we don't all stick together on points like this then we'll be shitting in the streets, clawing the bottoms of curtains and getting neutered by our owners. You may want to paraded around your local park on a tartan leash, only let off to chase the occasional tennis ball or stick but I AM A MAN, A HU-MAN and I have a point.powerpill wrote: lol@people becoming aggravated at these awards

ye maybe they shud of won it..djsence wrote:It's not being snobbish at all. I just think that the BEST DJ should get the best dj award. I am sure there are plenty of djs who have just as good of selection, better mixing and great technacality. maybe they should get the awrad. LOL and to me "good enough" does not equal THE BEST!spiderman wrote:
lol come on man, that just sounds snobbish.
he is a good dj. he mite not be the BEST technically, but his selection is sick and his mixing is good.
i could sit and nit pick and name dj's who are better mixers, but he is good enough of an all round dj. he deserves the award.
init.powerpill wrote:lol@people becoming aggravated at these awardsdjsence wrote:It's not being snobbish at all. I just think that the BEST DJ should get the best dj award. I am sure there are plenty of djs who have just as good of selection, better mixing and great technacality. maybe they should get the awrad. LOL and to me "good enough" does not equal THE BEST!spiderman wrote:
lol come on man, that just sounds snobbish.
he is a good dj. he mite not be the BEST technically, but his selection is sick and his mixing is good.
i could sit and nit pick and name dj's who are better mixers, but he is good enough of an all round dj. he deserves the award.
kani wrote:Thats the best news I havent heard all year!!
Rewinds are another technique used by dubstep DJs. If a song seems to be especially popular, the DJ will 'spin back' the record by hand without lifting the stylus, and play the track in question again. Rewinds are also an important live element in many of dubstep's precursors; the technique originates in dub reggae soundsystems, and is also used at UK garage and jungle nights.I heard him rewind 6 tunes in a row. That is a little much for me. I want to hear the song and get down to it. The rewind fucks it all.
have u ever been to a dubstep night???
not in England but in the US, yea.
Why do djs usually rewind multiple songs in a row over there?