Page 3 of 3
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:35 pm
				by afksandwich
				DROKKR wrote:bloody hell  
 
 
quite clever all the same, will they be named and shamed?
 
These days naming them is as good as advertising them.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:36 pm
				by rak'um
				I think its a load of bullshit to do the numbers they did you would have gotten into the top 10. i cant see no popstars doing a scam like tis to get to number 1 and there hasnt been any dodgy people in the charts that nobody knows who they are. It would have taken ages to do and you would need a massaive hard drive to store all the mp3s on and didnt nobody notice somebody with the same ip address downloading the same tune 100,000 times. I dont belive it, if its true wicked idea for a scam but you never was going to get away with it was you.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:42 pm
				by Be-1ne
				wow! ... I'm sure it's Be-1ne  
 
  shhhhhhhhhhh  

  lol
If i had that much free time i would def make use of it a bit more wisely than doing a retarded scam like that...  should make for funny veiwing on the 2009 xmas dumbest criminals special.  
 
Just looked on the BBC news site.... fair to say the itunes scam was slightly more inventive than this one:
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west ... 097296.stm 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:06 pm
				by shackles
				hahaha sorry but what a fucking idea! don;t buy big tvs n nice watches with stolen credit cards, buy your own tunes! Do you know if it was off thier own label aswell so they got nearly all the profit?
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:14 pm
				by google.com
				They collected the majority of royalties yes.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:14 pm
				by cosmic_surgeon
				DIRTY wrote:I can't believe some of you think this was a good idea!
If I ever did anything wrong, the first thing I asked myself was "can I get caught?" - I certainly wouldn't have led the trail of accountability right to my own doorstep. What an awful idea indeed.
Thing that gets me though is that these people are sat in cells for what they've done while MP's who have been committing similar acts of fraud are just losing their jobs (maybe) with no possibility of prosecution. Double standards much?
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:49 pm
				by dz
				I heard something about this from my lawyer. Very interesting stuff.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:18 am
				by screech
				LOL brilliant.  I'd love to know who this was... 

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:51 pm
				by dq
				has it come to light yet who did this? really interested to hear and can't believe it has been kept under wraps all this time. that suggests to me that either it's someone with clout, or there are larger forces involved.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:55 am
				by sigbowls
				thats why you need robots
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:00 am
				by set records
				dq wrote:has it come to light yet who did this? really interested to hear and can't believe it has been kept under wraps all this time. that suggests to me that either it's someone with clout, or there are larger forces involved.
tbh, you can't buy hype this good. best thing the big labels could do is sign them, market them as good and fool enough people with bad taste into buying their album... both will make money and in the end only itunes loses out. Guess they'll have to raise the price of a powerbook again init.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:24 am
				by jokerkhk
				Big idea!
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:32 am
				by notch
				DIRTY wrote:ingo4life wrote:Am the I the only one that thinks this was a seriously inventive scam, although time consuming. They'd have needed some serious disk space to accomodate all those mp3's. They better let us know who it was!
Remind me not to do a bank job with you next time
 
TRUTH!!
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:52 am
				by dgg
				why do people assume they downloaded every purchase? it's not like you must download something before you get to pay.
a worrying ignorance regarding legal downloads ...  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:25 pm
				by pure
				
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:50 pm
				by psylent
				DROKKR wrote:
The conspiracy theorist in me says inside job of some sort...
Maybe its the Illumanti  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:32 pm
				by redfire
				DROKKR wrote:DopeLabs wrote:yea i suspect some foul play was involved =]
 
 
play on words mate? lol
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:43 pm
				by baydestrian