Dubstepforum.com

don't care for it tbh. definitely wouldn't want it on my property tho

Agent 47 wrote:how many people rate graffiti? be interesting to see

https://dubstepforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 7&t=127422

ultraspatial wrote:don't care for it tbh. definitely wouldn't want it on my property tho

even if you like it?
i dont paint in people houses though

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote: i dont hate it aesthetically tbf, just rarely rate it as an art form

wat?

it can look okay sometimes but it doesnt really have much meaning for me

not very #deep

Agent 47 wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote: i dont hate it aesthetically tbf, just rarely rate it as an art form

wat?

it can look okay sometimes but it doesnt really have much meaning for me

not very #deep

yeah i don't like 80 % of the graffiti i see, but isn´t that like everything?

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote: i dont hate it aesthetically tbf, just rarely rate it as an art form

wat?

it can look okay sometimes but it doesnt really have much meaning for me

not very #deep

yeah i don't like 80 % of the graffiti i see, but isn´t that like everything?

Yeah pretty much this.

I had a heated discussion an ex one time, and to sum it up, she essentially liked the art form but couldnt appreciate it if it was vandalism. For me, the vandalism is what really makes it art, compared to it just being a pretty mural.

Different strokes for different folks. I for one think a lot of high art is shit.

yeah the problemm is that any tnuc can get a spray and sometimes the city looks lame. All about choosing good places to bomb!

Anyone ever seen a graffiti tag "pk kid"? I've seen it all over the place, in several different states.

In fact:



I think that's pretty cool. Getting into crazy ass places and tagging your alias. Millions of people see your mark but no one knows who you are...



Now that I think about it, it's probably thousands of people who just tag the same name cause they wanna be part of it.

DiegoSapiens wrote:

ultraspatial wrote:don't care for it tbh. definitely wouldn't want it on my property tho

even if you like it?
i dont paint in people houses though

doesn't matter if i like it or not. it's like i designed it like this and i don't want any mods to it just cause some kid thought it would be cool. buy a building if you wanna do that imo

the argument that its not vandalism is fucking ridiculous

i dont care, but it deffo is

how people can think its not is beyond me

r u a cop?

Agent 47 wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote: i dont hate it aesthetically tbf, just rarely rate it as an art form

wat?

it can look okay sometimes but it doesnt really have much meaning for me

not very #deep

True art doesn't have meaning imo, it's for its own sake.

Agent 47 wrote:the argument that its not vandalism is fucking ridiculous

i dont care, but it deffo is

how people can think its not is beyond me

When someone pays you, or gives you a blank wall to make a mural, its not vandalism. There are tons of artists out there who are contracted to do legal "graffiti".

idk who argued it wasnt vandalism, was that before

kidshuffle wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:the argument that its not vandalism is fucking ridiculous

i dont care, but it deffo is

how people can think its not is beyond me

When someone pays you, or gives you a blank wall to make a mural, its not vandalism. There are tons of artists out there who are contracted to do legal "graffiti".

yeah i'm not on about that

ultraspatial wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:the argument that its not vandalism is fucking ridiculous

i dont care, but it deffo is

how people can think its not is beyond me

When someone pays you, or gives you a blank wall to make a mural, its not vandalism. There are tons of artists out there who are contracted to do legal "graffiti".

yeah i'm not on about that

yeah obviously im not on about that

i dont care that people do it, just saying... it is vandalism lol

again tho, anyone who really appreciates graffiti, rather than graffiti inspired murals, completely understands its vandalism. thats half of the concept.

thats like saying you don't understand its wrong to steal [insert item agent has stolen]. obviously you realize its wrong, but you still found some sort of appeal to it.

jesslem wrote:

Agent 47 wrote:

DiegoSapiens wrote:

Agent 47 wrote: i dont hate it aesthetically tbf, just rarely rate it as an art form

wat?

it can look okay sometimes but it doesnt really have much meaning for me

not very #deep

True art doesn't have meaning imo, it's for its own sake.

yeah not really a meaning, but like a a feeling to it

i cant really describe what i mean. kinda like how some music you can feel it has soul - you feel what the artist wanted to portray, not necessarily a message or meaning

i never get more than an 'oh that looks kinda cool' with graffiti

kidshuffle wrote:again tho, anyone who really appreciates graffiti, rather than graffiti inspired murals, completely understands its vandalism. thats half of the concept.

thats like saying you don't understand its wrong to steal [insert item agent has stolen]. its wrong, but you still find some sort of appeal to it.

yeah cool thats fine

thats the aspect i like most about it tbf lol

but ive heard people argue that its not vandalism before. i was just addressing dat

well, those people are morons and they should be treated as such.

it would be really cool if someone could get away with painting a whole building a block colour

if you woke up to go bank n the whole building was like florescent blue