Re: London 2012 Olympics Rolling Thread
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 3:29 pm
There's no way Wiggo can cycle that fast with those sideburns.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Now that would be an opening ceremony to behold.tyger wrote:(or start a rival games where all drugs are allowed - the narcolympics.)
Weak.magma wrote:There's no way Wiggo can cycle that fast with those sideburns.
Sorry. At least you know I haven't been taking humour enhancing substances.Perej wrote:Weak.magma wrote:There's no way Wiggo can cycle that fast with those sideburns.
magma wrote:How am I being shown up? I'm attempting to defend a schoolgirl who's performed an incredible feat, has been tested to the best of the Olympics abilities and is still being bullied by people who had never heard of her a week ago.hugh wrote:because not everyone is a 16 year old girl beating the world record by 2.5 seconds and in the process beating the lap times of the fastest Male athletes. It's not defeatist. It's logic. You are being shown up so are just attacking some random aspect of my personality.
Her blood samples will continue to be tested for 8 years, so the likelyhood is if she did cheat, she will be found out eventually. In the meantime, I think it's probably nicest to let her have her glory moment.
I realise this is an immensely controversial viewpoint!
But, carry on however you wish. I'm sure picking on a little girl is making everyone's day better. I shall retreat in case my posts start to exhibit signs of thesaurus misuse.
She didn't she went quicker than an athlete that slowed down to win the race> His was hardly the quickest freestyle in his race he just already had it nailed.hugh wrote: because not everyone is a 16 year old girl beating the world record by 2.5 seconds and in the process beating the lap times of the fastest Male athletes. It's not defeatist. It's logic. You are being shown up so are just attacking some random aspect of my personality.
When can I pick up my drugs to start training?tyger wrote:start a rival games where all drugs are allowed - the narcolympics
Why so bitter?pkay wrote:She would be the first Olympic calibre athlete to gain 4 seconds in one year between world and Olympics ..... except she gained 7. The greatest swimming growth the world has ever seen came from a 16 year old female
Equivelanys would be USA winning the world cup, great Britain winning the gold in basketball, Greenland winning beach volleyball, etc
We're discussing a current event in a thread specific to this type of current event.JBoy wrote:Why so bitter?pkay wrote:She would be the first Olympic calibre athlete to gain 4 seconds in one year between world and Olympics ..... except she gained 7. The greatest swimming growth the world has ever seen came from a 16 year old female
Equivelanys would be USA winning the world cup, great Britain winning the gold in basketball, Greenland winning beach volleyball, etc
Sadly, this exact scenario will probably play out somewhere in rural Alabama or something.pkay wrote:We're discussing a current event in a thread specific to this type of current event.JBoy wrote:Why so bitter?pkay wrote:She would be the first Olympic calibre athlete to gain 4 seconds in one year between world and Olympics ..... except she gained 7. The greatest swimming growth the world has ever seen came from a 16 year old female
Equivelanys would be USA winning the world cup, great Britain winning the gold in basketball, Greenland winning beach volleyball, etc
Its not like I'm taking a rock with a note attached saying "give the medal back whore!" And throwing it through my local chineese food establishment
Yes teenagers see drastic gains. But its not from 14th in active world to greatest human ever.... its more commonly going from 125th in the world to 30th.scspkr99 wrote:It's arguable that a 16 year old female is exactly the demographic most likely to display that type of growth. It's also possible that the very nature of the event has her with some very specific gains on weaker strokes. There's also the different transitions between the strokes so I can see how it would be an event open to pretty significant gains.
Now I'm not pretending to know enough to say with any degree of certainty that she's clean or not. The thing is I don't expect anyone vociferously suggesting she's not to know enough either.