Re: Ferguson riots
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:34 pm

#oops
Hmm i guess that is truemagma wrote:Protest and especially "riot" is about tipping points. No, the Michael Brown shooting isn't the most clean cut example of inappropriate police violence or brutality in America, but yes, it happened at a time and in a place where the next big case would spark action. People have been talking "tinder boxes" when it comes to relationships with authority, especially Black relationships with authority in American cities more and more frequently for the last few years... it's no surprise that it bubbled over when it did. To think that ALL this is a reaction to one incident is selling it a bit short.dickman69 wrote:There is a problem in the USA w police & racism & guns
Is this the story to use to be the face of all these issue
Fucking no
imo its actually selfish/ignorant to use the death of a person to become martyr or more accurately a mascot for whatever cause you choose to assign him to
The UK riots a few years ago had very little to do with Mark Duggan in reality, but they wouldn't have happened when they did without his killing. The LA riots in 1992 weren't just about Rodney King. It's about a notion latching onto more and more of society until it tips the scale and people realise, perhaps too late, that they urgently need to do something.
Come on man.nowaysj wrote:
#oops
The lack of indictment isn't unexpected in the slightest... but rolled into the reaction to the protests, it serves to underline just how few fucks are given by people in positions of authority about those who are at the mercy of authority - that alone is a reason to remind authorities that these issues won't be forgotten about. Michael Brown shouldn't have been acting how he was, but he did nothing that should reasonably result in a person's death - that in itself should be cause for a nationwide conversation about the broken relationship with Police and the justifications required for Police officers to use lethal force, but it hasn't... instead, the riots have been largely broadcast as a mixture of entertainment and scare-story about feral, swarthy urbanites... and yet again, nothing has changed. There will be another Michael Brown, just like there will be another Trayvon Martin... neither case were the perfect example of the issues they brought to light, but both will be repeated due to the lack of productive response from anyone with any power to change things.dickman69 wrote:Hmm i guess that is truemagma wrote:Protest and especially "riot" is about tipping points. No, the Michael Brown shooting isn't the most clean cut example of inappropriate police violence or brutality in America, but yes, it happened at a time and in a place where the next big case would spark action. People have been talking "tinder boxes" when it comes to relationships with authority, especially Black relationships with authority in American cities more and more frequently for the last few years... it's no surprise that it bubbled over when it did. To think that ALL this is a reaction to one incident is selling it a bit short.dickman69 wrote:There is a problem in the USA w police & racism & guns
Is this the story to use to be the face of all these issue
Fucking no
imo its actually selfish/ignorant to use the death of a person to become martyr or more accurately a mascot for whatever cause you choose to assign him to
The UK riots a few years ago had very little to do with Mark Duggan in reality, but they wouldn't have happened when they did without his killing. The LA riots in 1992 weren't just about Rodney King. It's about a notion latching onto more and more of society until it tips the scale and people realise, perhaps too late, that they urgently need to do something.
I still think the handling of the riots right after the shooting should be the focus of everyones outrage, not the actual incident
Because if looked at objectively, it was pretty obvious to me that wilson wouldnt be indicted and he prob wont be found guilty in any sort of wrongful death trial either (if the brown family would even go through one)
You're talking to a man wearing fake dreadlocks for a laugh in his avi...Harkat wrote:Come on man.nowaysj wrote:
#oops
Hip hop isn't responsible for black people being treated equally or not
Taking hip hop to officially represent black people, or poor black people like that is ignorant as fuck
They're not fake. They're patch cables. And I was born this way.magma wrote:You're talking to a man wearing fake dreadlocks for a laugh in his avi...Harkat wrote:Come on man.nowaysj wrote:
#oops
Hip hop isn't responsible for black people being treated equally or not
Taking hip hop to officially represent black people, or poor black people like that is ignorant as fuck
Harkat wrote:Hip hop isn't responsible for black people being treated equally or not
Taking hip hop to officially represent black people, or poor black people like that is ignorant as fuck.
Now I see where I said that.nowaysj wrote:See, that's what YOU'RE LIKE
nowaysj wrote:Now I see where I said that.nowaysj wrote:See, that's what YOU'RE LIKE
When that tweet says "WE can't scream murder, misogyny, lawlessness then turn around and ask for equality & justice", the "we" is talking about black people, right?nowaysj wrote:![]()
Do I need to do more thanHarkat wrote:nowaysj wrote:Now I see where I said that.nowaysj wrote:See, that's what YOU'RE LIKEWhen that tweet says "WE can't scream murder, misogyny, lawlessness then turn around and ask for equality & justice", the "we" is talking about black people, right?nowaysj wrote:![]()
So in other words, hip hop is attached to black people and has nasty lyrics, so black people don't get to ask for equality and justice.
So hip hop artist are asking for equality and justice lol? And what the fuck would that have to do with ferguson?dickman69 wrote:Pretty sure the we is hip hop artists