Re: Anyone honestly feeling Juke?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:41 am
theres a third?baseband wrote:the new bangs & works from planet mu is really good. definitely pushing things further than the first one
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
theres a third?baseband wrote:the new bangs & works from planet mu is really good. definitely pushing things further than the first one
errr i mean, the less old bangs & works from planet mu is really good. didnt realize it had been out for so long. just arrived today for me. must have been held up with a pre-order from a while back or something. its gotten to the point now where i dont even remember ordering certain records, they just arrive on my doorstep and catch me by surprise after workwobbles wrote:theres a third?baseband wrote:the new bangs & works from planet mu is really good. definitely pushing things further than the first one

a couple of years ago back in sweden, before i knew anything about anything i bought this:rayman612 wrote:I just found out that the actual track Bangs & Works slowed to 135 sounds awesome
i never said it wasn't danceable, i said it's not much for dancing, it really isn't, you're in denial if you think otherwise. trust if i played footwork and dubstep anywhere in the world people would move more to footwork. Besides what they do in terms of moving is far more of a "dance" than the shoegazing that the dubsteppers do.JBoy wrote:Except dubstep is totally danceable and this 'footwork' stuff sounds so poorly produced id either laugh or go for a piss if it got played live.
koo wrote:thread title should be changed to ''anyone honestly not feeling juke?''
wat?llennnn16 wrote:As far as production, I used to think the same thing about Dubstep. First time i heard Digital Mystikz i laughed at the production. sounded like a 10 year old made it, but i learned that's just their sound.
cpt.pollution wrote:wat?llennnn16 wrote:As far as production, I used to think the same thing about Dubstep. First time i heard Digital Mystikz i laughed at the production. sounded like a 10 year old made it, but i learned that's just their sound.
I can understand that. When i first heard Dubstep around 2004-05 i thought exactly the same, to me the majority of it sounded lazy and ammature in production, stuff you write when you first start producing. I think it was because i was listening to really polished music all the time but now i can appreciate the simplicity and beauty of it but back then i didn't.llennnn16 wrote:JBoy wrote:As far as production, I used to think the same thing about Dubstep. First time i heard Digital Mystikz i laughed at the production. sounded like a 10 year old made it, but i learned that's just their sound. Footwork is not badly produced, that's just how the sound is, if it changed it wouldn't be Footwork.