Dubstepforum.com

chainsawclownstyle wrote:The great thing about Sub.FM is that when there are archives playing on Dubstep.FM, there is a live show going on Sub.FM.

When there is a live show going on Dubstep.FM, there is always an archive playing on Sub.FM.

Both are relevant to my interests. There are shows on both stations that I do not miss. I am often in the chat, but even more of the time I am listening and not in the chat. When I am in the chat there is almost always someone in the Dubstep.FM chat, with minor lags sometimes in the conversation. Same with Sub.FM.

So let's whip them out, take a measurement and record who is bigger in order for us to get on about the business of making music happen and stopping the talking about making music happen.

Regardless of whether or not those people are listening or idle with music playing in an empty room, there are more people connected to Dubstep.FM according to the numbers. When Dopelabs pays his bandwidth bill, he can't make the argument that half the bandwidth wasn't being heard ya know... but the real point is that it doesn't matter. We could all sit here and argue the finer points of why we prefer what station, but at the end of the day I usually just listen to whatever is live and skip the archives.

I will say that on Dubstep.FM Dopelabs will drop the connection on the DJ if they wheel a tune for a 5th or 6th time, which is always appreciated lol.

steppo wrote:mad love for dubstep.fm fammo. end of story

somerandomguy wrote:lets just agree all the stations rock

streetwhyz wrote:[Live!] Dubs Alive Radio 5 Hosted By Bakir W/ Special Guest J Rogers - http://www.dubstep.fm/listen.pls

http://www.dubstep.fm/chat


come in and see for yourself.

seckle wrote:it has to be said that listener stats on any internet radio station are never accurate or factual. this is why major stations like the BBC are audited by independent agencies like rajar.

http://radiotoday.co.uk/rajar/

FSTZ wrote:

seckle wrote:it has to be said that listener stats on any internet radio station are never accurate or factual. this is why major stations like the BBC are audited by independent agencies like rajar.

http://radiotoday.co.uk/rajar/

there is no reason for us to fradulently hike the ratings...

we're not collecting advertising revenue and it's most certainly not done to impress the people on this forum

seckle wrote:

FSTZ wrote:

seckle wrote:it has to be said that listener stats on any internet radio station are never accurate or factual. this is why major stations like the BBC are audited by independent agencies like rajar.

http://radiotoday.co.uk/rajar/

there is no reason for us to fradulently hike the ratings...

we're not collecting advertising revenue and it's most certainly not done to impress the people on this forum

who said anything about fraud? all i'm saying is that these stats are never accurate, and telling people its factual, is trying to impress this forum.

seckle wrote:it has to be said that listener stats on any internet radio station are never accurate or factual. this is why major stations like the BBC are audited by independent agencies like rajar.

http://radiotoday.co.uk/rajar/

FSTZ wrote:hmm,

I guess I misunderstood

I just don't get the sub.fm vs dubstep.fm

it's not a competition with me, it's music

music that I care deeply about