Re: Ministry of Sound Dubstep comp
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:15 pm
i couldn't resist sorryaddc182 wrote:brasco wrote:wheres mt eden?really?
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
i couldn't resist sorryaddc182 wrote:brasco wrote:wheres mt eden?really?
yea the last one they did, think it was called addicted to bass or something just as cheesy. that wernt mixed. all seperate tracks, i was suprised. im guessing this one will be the same, otherwise they would of got an ace face to mix it. im suprised ruskos not plastered all over the front of it.keirondrk wrote:surprised to see this, but the tracklisting could have been a hell'a load worse.. so may help rather then hinder seeing as it has a bit of variation...
I'm guessing it's mixed like most MOS cd's although I did hear one recently that wasn't mixed at all.. so got me curious..
so spongebob will finally see a non vinyl release?clifford_- wrote:yea the last one they did, think it was called addicted to bass or something just as cheesy. that wernt mixed. all seperate tracks, i was suprised. im guessing this one will be the same, otherwise they would of got an ace face to mix it. im suprised ruskos not plastered all over the front of it.keirondrk wrote:surprised to see this, but the tracklisting could have been a hell'a load worse.. so may help rather then hinder seeing as it has a bit of variation...
I'm guessing it's mixed like most MOS cd's although I did hear one recently that wasn't mixed at all.. so got me curious..
If it is, this is an insta-bag for me.Mutiny wrote:so spongebob will finally see a non vinyl release?clifford_- wrote:yea the last one they did, think it was called addicted to bass or something just as cheesy. that wernt mixed. all seperate tracks, i was suprised. im guessing this one will be the same, otherwise they would of got an ace face to mix it. im suprised ruskos not plastered all over the front of it.keirondrk wrote:surprised to see this, but the tracklisting could have been a hell'a load worse.. so may help rather then hinder seeing as it has a bit of variation...
I'm guessing it's mixed like most MOS cd's although I did hear one recently that wasn't mixed at all.. so got me curious..
Surely this has to be mixed?collige wrote:If it is, this is an insta-bag for me.Mutiny wrote:so spongebob will finally see a non vinyl release?clifford_- wrote:yea the last one they did, think it was called addicted to bass or something just as cheesy. that wernt mixed. all seperate tracks, i was suprised. im guessing this one will be the same, otherwise they would of got an ace face to mix it. im suprised ruskos not plastered all over the front of it.keirondrk wrote:surprised to see this, but the tracklisting could have been a hell'a load worse.. so may help rather then hinder seeing as it has a bit of variation...
I'm guessing it's mixed like most MOS cd's although I did hear one recently that wasn't mixed at all.. so got me curious..
lol at how that video skips straight over brackles remix of crookers, the first good song on there.
That is very well put.ahier wrote:lol at how that video skips straight over brackles remix of crookers, the first good song on there.
though to be fair, this can only be a good thing, people will buy it seeing the tracks they think are "fucking dirt filth granny smashers", put it on, and after repeat listens will realise just how good all the other stuff is that isnt aggy electro-metal. this is how i discovered the deeper side, after listening to skreams essential mix and C&R fabriclive, i realised the most interesting songs were the deeper ones.
education for the masses innit, in a format they can take. the tracklist order is even constructed pretty well for breaking it to people. ministry are clever folks, you can tell they been in this for years.
Mutiny wrote:so spongebob will finally see a non vinyl release?clifford_- wrote:yea the last one they did, think it was called addicted to bass or something just as cheesy. that wernt mixed. all seperate tracks, i was suprised. im guessing this one will be the same, otherwise they would of got an ace face to mix it. im suprised ruskos not plastered all over the front of it.keirondrk wrote:surprised to see this, but the tracklisting could have been a hell'a load worse.. so may help rather then hinder seeing as it has a bit of variation...
I'm guessing it's mixed like most MOS cd's although I did hear one recently that wasn't mixed at all.. so got me curious..
I just find it funny that everyone who used to rinse me for listening to dubstep now "love" it. But I do agree, its a massive achievement to get it to where it is now. I dont think anyone could have predicted how big dubstep was going to be 4 or 5 years ago. Shame alot of the big tunes seem to have lost their connection to the original sounds of the music. Alot of people see dubstep as, and I quote "a way to make pop songs sound better" Thats a genuine quotespydee wrote:i saw a poster for this in baker street station today.
really struck me then how far this scenes come. everyone involved from the producers through to the listeners and bloggers deserves a pat on the back for supporting and pushing it to this height. im not just talking about having a ministry compilation, im talking about the general status of the genre. you may question parts and styles of it, and it may not be such a close lit thing anymore, but at its core its still a thriving creative engine spreading good vibes between people.
nobody can predict the future and things may become better or they may become worse, but just take a step back and appreciate how far its come at this point in time. its truely admirable. must be amazing for the original heads to have helped fan a musical flame into such a big global fire.
the analogy that came to my mind was like how a parent would feel to see their child become a succesful adult of their own. it makes you feel proud.
how did you get involved in a job like that? I ask because it is something that I would have loved to do, and as one of millions who would love music to become a proffesional thing, was wandering how you went about getting into that situation?joe muggs wrote:That is very well put.ahier wrote:lol at how that video skips straight over brackles remix of crookers, the first good song on there.
though to be fair, this can only be a good thing, people will buy it seeing the tracks they think are "fucking dirt filth granny smashers", put it on, and after repeat listens will realise just how good all the other stuff is that isnt aggy electro-metal. this is how i discovered the deeper side, after listening to skreams essential mix and C&R fabriclive, i realised the most interesting songs were the deeper ones.
education for the masses innit, in a format they can take. the tracklist order is even constructed pretty well for breaking it to people. ministry are clever folks, you can tell they been in this for years.
Before I agreed to do the notes, I watched how the track licensing process went, and as I said, I wouldn't have done it if I didn't think they knew what they were doing.
To those concerned about ommissions, rest assured that they wanted a LOT of other names, including many of those mentioned in this thread, but licensing tracks especially from small labels is never easy - people don't respond in time, are on tour, can't find the masters, drive too hard a bargain, or just plain don't want to license their tracks. It was a real eye-opener seeing what a complex process it is, in fact!
that is what most people think of dubstep, however if they bought this compilation, the top 40 songs with filthy wobble would act as a doorway into the true side of dubstep, the mala and the shackleton and the artwork and all the other bits that make up the dubstep that most of us love.Dark Reign wrote:Whats Dubstep? Dubstep is where someone takes a shitty top 40 song and puts a filthy wobble on it.
This is what most people think of dusbtep
Did anyone else go when FWD hosted the side room for Rinsessions at MOS back in 2005? The line-up was ridiculouskoose wrote:They had a couple of nights down there called WhyNot? or Why? (i think) a few years back. Sometimes a smaller room had some as well I think on some dnb nights.prisoner wrote:forgive me as im not a londoner, but does MOS ever have dubstep parties?

oh my lordy lord! both of those rooms would have been absolute fire.measure d wrote:Did anyone else go when FWD hosted the side room for Rinsessions at MOS back in 2005? The line-up was ridiculouskoose wrote:They had a couple of nights down there called WhyNot? or Why? (i think) a few years back. Sometimes a smaller room had some as well I think on some dnb nights.prisoner wrote:forgive me as im not a londoner, but does MOS ever have dubstep parties?