Re: england is grim
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 5:36 pm
FLAGS ARE RUINING FOOTBALL!!!!
saphyre wrote:just look at the american flag and what kind of people over there use it over there, theyve even got a specific flag for racist use (confederate flag)
Roflrilla wrote:Then you're a typical NF skinhead tnuc who probably walks around town yelling "pakis go home"mr. lizard wrote:If it offends people, then that is a bonusRoflrilla wrote:No but if you deliberately put it up to annoy/offend people then you probably would be. In East London at least.mr. lizard wrote:I think that if I was displaying the England flag in this country, and someone said to me that they don't like my England flag I would tell them to fuck off. That is not racism.Pistonsbeneath wrote:i think the very people that say if you dont like my england flag fuck off home actually want to make foreigners uncomfortable because theyre deep down racist fucks
wrapped in british newspapers, don't want any of that foreign stuffPistonsbeneath wrote:
you probably insist on egg n chips when you go to spain instead of trying the local paella
Try saying that to Westwoodkay wrote:FLAGS ARE RUINING FOOTBALL!!!!
what a bunch of sheepleherbalicious wrote:Fuck's sake...how did this convo turn to this shit?
GWA was moaning coz the flags are lame and pointless. Not because they're offending people due to any racist connotations.
The flags are a pointless thing for people to buy, and the fact people feel they need to buy them to show they're supporting their country is just a typical reaction from advertisement telling you that you must.
THAT is why England is grim. No other reason. End thread.
At the beginning of the Crusades, a red cross on white was already associated with England because this was St George's cross, the emblem associated with England's patron saint. Although the Pope decided English crusaders would be distinguished by wearing a white cross on red, and French crusaders a red cross on white (Italian knights were allocated a yellow cross on a white background),[2] English knights soon decided to claim "their" cross of red on white, like the French. In January 1188, in a meeting between Henry II of England and Philip II of France, the two rivals agreed to exchange flags (France later changed its new white cross on red for a white cross on a dark blue flag).[3] Some French knights carried on using the red cross however, and as English knights wore this pattern as well, the red cross on white became the typical crusader symbol regardless of nationality.
For centuries, and as carried by crusaders throughout Europe during the crusades, it has long been referred to as "God's Flag". This interpretation of the Flag of Saint George as "God's Flag" was carried to America by early members of the Church of England and Anglican community in early American history.
yes the flag represented the crusades 1000 years ago. Now it means "england"Pedro Sánchez wrote:Them flags have represented dumb stnuc from day dot.
At the beginning of the Crusades, a red cross on white was already associated with England because this was St George's cross, the emblem associated with England's patron saint. Although the Pope decided English crusaders would be distinguished by wearing a white cross on red, and French crusaders a red cross on white (Italian knights were allocated a yellow cross on a white background),[2] English knights soon decided to claim "their" cross of red on white, like the French. In January 1188, in a meeting between Henry II of England and Philip II of France, the two rivals agreed to exchange flags (France later changed its new white cross on red for a white cross on a dark blue flag).[3] Some French knights carried on using the red cross however, and as English knights wore this pattern as well, the red cross on white became the typical crusader symbol regardless of nationality.For centuries, and as carried by crusaders throughout Europe during the crusades, it has long been referred to as "God's Flag". This interpretation of the Flag of Saint George as "God's Flag" was carried to America by early members of the Church of England and Anglican community in early American history.
I wish I had seen this post before, fucking LOL. Just because some racists identify with the confederate flag, doesn't mean its a racist symbol. If that were the case, any flag would pretty much represent the same.saphyre wrote:just look at the american flag and what kind of people over there use it over there, theyve even got a specific flag for racist use (confederate flag)
that was kind of in jest. but i remember going to south carolina i think and there were whole shops (stores) just selling confederate flag paraphernalia, there were even t shirts with the confederate flag saying "if this shirt offends you then..." AKA "im not racist but..."kidshuffle wrote:I wish I had seen this post before, fucking LOL. Just because some racists identify with the confederate flag, doesn't mean its a racist symbol. If that were the case, any flag would pretty much represent the same.saphyre wrote:just look at the american flag and what kind of people over there use it over there, theyve even got a specific flag for racist use (confederate flag)
WhosZena? wrote:Try saying that to Westwoodkay wrote:FLAGS ARE RUINING FOOTBALL!!!!