Kodachrome wrote:
So some of us know about internet culture/trends. No shame in that.
i know right, if you're reasonably intelligent you only need to hear about / look at something once before you know what it's about...
so Hibbie, i guess by your standards you're now a nerd and should feel embarrassed for the simple reason that you stumbled across a random fact and can now participate in the discussion
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:28 am
by pompende
pkay wrote:
AxeD wrote:Just read chan and lulzsec aren't at 'war' at all though.
yeah over the weekend it seems they agreed to share targets and stop fucking with each others video games lol
just to clarify:
when you started this thread on friday
LulzSec wrote:To confirm, we aren't going after Anonymous. 4chan isn't Anonymous to begin with, and /b/ is certainly not the whole of 4chan. True story.
its a fun fable... cant trust the #mediafags tho
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:40 am
by butt jolokia
The strength of the intelligence community's infrastructure doesn't depend on its fucking public website.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:58 am
by knell
looks like lulzsec has adopted shitty dubstep with lame rap over it as its theme song -.-
The F.B.I. seized Web servers in a raid on a data center early Tuesday, causing several Web sites, including those run by the New York publisher Curbed Network, to go offline.
The raid happened at 1:15 a.m. at a hosting facility in Reston, Va., used by DigitalOne, which is based in Switzerland, the company said. The F.B.I. did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the raid.
In an e-mail to one of its clients on Tuesday afternoon, DigitalOne’s chief executive, Sergej Ostroumow, said: “This problem is caused by the F.B.I., not our company. In the night F.B.I. has taken 3 enclosures with equipment plugged into them, possibly including your server — we cannot check it.”
Mr. Ostroumow said that the F.B.I. was only interested in one of the company’s clients but had taken servers used by “tens of clients.”
He wrote: “After F.B.I.’s unprofessional ‘work’ we can not restart our own servers, that’s why our Web site is offline and support doesn’t work.” The company’s staff had been working to solve the problem for the previous 15 hours, he said.
Mr. Ostroumow said in response to e-mailed questions that it was not clear if the issues would be resolved by Wednesday.
A government official who declined to be named said earlier in the day that the F.B.I. was actively investigating the Lulz Security group and any affiliated hackers. The official said the F.B.I. had teamed up with other agencies in this effort, including the Central Intelligence Agency and cybercrime bureaus in Europe.
Mr. Ostroumow declined to name the company targeted by the F.B.I. and said that he did not know why it had drawn their interest. It was also unclear why the agents took more servers with them than they sought, he said.
The sites of the Curbed Network, including popular blogs covering real estate, restaurants and other topics, were all unavailable Tuesday evening. Lockhart Steele, Curbed’s president, said his team realized that the company’s sites were down at around 3 a.m. and contacted DigitalOne. After initially declining to say what had happened, DigitalOne explained that the F.B.I. had raided the data center, Mr. Steele said.
“Our servers happened to be in with some naughty servers,” he said, adding that his sites were not the target of the raid. Curbed is working to get its sites back online, probably by Wednesday.
The raid also affected a server used by Instapaper, a popular service that saves articles for later reading. Marco Arment, Instapaper’s founder, said he lost contact with a server hosted by DigitalOne early on Tuesday. Instapaper’s Web site is still operating but has slowed somewhat. Mr. Arment said he had not heard from DigitalOne or law enforcement, and had no reason to believe that Instapaper was a target of the raid.
Pinboard, a bookmarking site, was operating on a backup server and some of its features were turned off, a post on its site said.
DigitalOne provided all necessary information to pinpoint the servers for a specific I.P. address, Mr. Ostroumow said. However, the agents took entire server racks, perhaps because they mistakenly thought that “one enclosure is = to one server,” he said in an e-mail.
DigitalOne had no employees on-site when the raid took place. The data center operator, from which DigitalOne leases space, passed along the information about the raid three hours after it started with the name of the agent and a phone number to call.
Before learning of the raid, Mr. Ostroumow, who is in Switzerland with the rest of his team, thought the problem was a technical glitch.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:52 am
by drokkr
I was just about to post that ^
Surely, they could have just copied the information the need from the servers. The sooner cloud computing gets it's shit together the better imo.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:54 pm
by bigfootspartan
knell wrote:looks like lulzsec has adopted shitty dubstep with lame rap over it as its theme song -.-
i can just imagine some pale twiggy bastards sitting in some basement: so guys, what should we attack next!? We need something th at the bitches would be impressed by.... Dubstep is popular with the bitches....
Hide your dubs! Lulsec will snatch them and spit their twiggy vitreous all over them!
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:37 pm
by HamCrescendo
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:26 am
by kingGhost
yea gonna be hilarious til they throw their nerdy asses in jail.
big al needs a new girlfriend ya heard
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:41 am
by deadly_habit
ah crackers tweeting, gonna be funny when they get busted
calling themselves hackers minus maybe a few members lol
wanna join em filestube loic and be a tool
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:54 pm
by hugh
I remember reading some articles in the independent a while back about this dude who was obsessed with hacking for no real reason. He would hack into the CIA and Pentagon and have a really good poke around. Eventually he was caught but it turned out he had severe autistic problems and basically lived for the rush of anonymous hacking. I think this sort of psyche is very common in the hacking community. They are just kinda different people.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:27 pm
by dubmatters
hugh wrote:I remember reading some articles in the independent a while back about this dude who was obsessed with hacking for no real reason. He would hack into the CIA and Pentagon and have a really good poke around. Eventually he was caught but it turned out he had severe autistic problems and basically lived for the rush of anonymous hacking. I think this sort of psyche is very common in the hacking community. They are just kinda different people.
And where is any kind of proof of anything he claims to have seen?
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:56 pm
by fractal
nonexistent of course
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:30 pm
by wormcode
Well that's just what he said he wanted.
Anything he had is evidence now. He said the images each took over an hour to load because of huge uncompressed files and a bad connection probably from routing through networks. He said there were whole stations set up just for editing out questionable stuff ("UFOs") in the pics.
There's lots of videos and even some documentaries on the "edited/airbrushed" NASA images. I believe they edit them, like anyone releasing government related things would do, like how they edit military bases from aerial views etc. Whether or not there's something sinister or UFO related I don't know, but IMO it's more likely the editing out of military technology or info they don't want in foreign hands.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:36 pm
by knell
i don't know about him, but personally, if i had hacked into NASA, and found anything related to UFOs/Free energy, i would've take a million screenshots, downloaded the images and re-hosted them on every server i could find.
but that's just me.
Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:39 pm
by nowaysj
You are also not a depressed pot smoking assburger hacker...or are you?