Page 4 of 4
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:01 pm
by SCope13
Might have to read Siddharta so I can have an opinion on it.
Also, Atlas Shrugged is probably the worst book ever.
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:03 pm
by ehbes
SCope13 wrote:Might have to read Siddharta so I can have an opinion on it.
Also, Atlas Shrugged is probably the worst book ever.
its terrible
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:05 pm
by cloquet
Steppenwolf by Hesse is great
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:23 pm
by Naan_Bread
I read an earlier Hesse I hadn't heard of called Gertrude last month and thought it was wonderful.
@ehbrums It gets his main ideas across without the mysticism or weirdness of Siddartha or The Glass Bead Game if that put you of those or your opinion I'd based on them.
My favorite three are Kafka, Hesse and Camus. I love Ulysses but haven't really given much time to the rest of Joyce. Never understood why Ulysses has such a stigma: it's much more straightforward than Naked Lunch which a lot of people seem to be posting (I remain convinced that book is a massive in-joke, I tried and failed to read it in sequence but enjoy flicking it open and reading random pages.)
Biggest offender posted so far is On The Road, that shit is the hipster equivalent of The Alchemist.
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:27 pm
by Naan_Bread
For more character driven, enjoyable reads that I would still consider classics I would reccomend
Earthly Powers - Anthony Burgess
Point Counter Point - Aldous Huxley
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:39 pm
by yoowan
Re: What do you consider to be 'classic' books/literature?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:06 pm
by cloquet
Naan Bread wrote:it's much more straightforward than Naked Lunch which a lot of people seem to be posting (I remain convinced that book is a massive in-joke, I tried and failed to read it in sequence but enjoy flicking it open and reading random pages.)
dipping into burroughs (no pun intended) is probably the best way to read him. obviously the stuff with a linear narrative, like junky & queer, is designed to be read in sequence but naked lunch and the nova trilogy can be read in any order. it's one of his ways of breaking down systems of control.