worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
But 320mp3 is far superior to vinyl - this is easily proven with tests! Why would you say such a thing when many DJs use mp3 these days.Taiken wrote:you will never play shitty mp3 at my dances, even if they are legal, because of the quality.
No, this is pretty much false unless it's a bad cut, master and a good enough set up.Simulant wrote:But 320mp3 is far superior to vinyl - this is easily proven with tests! Why would you say such a thing when many DJs use mp3 these days.Taiken wrote:you will never play shitty mp3 at my dances, even if they are legal, because of the quality.
What? How does that work? That's crazy talk.jonahmann wrote:* Analogue sounds better than digital partly because frequencies beyond those audible influence your perception of the sound.
And the impact of making a big sheet of plastic from oil has no impact on the environment? Plus the process of recording audio onto said vinyl takes less energy than downloading an mp3? More crazy talk.jonahmann wrote:* Downloading data pollutes the environment. The electricity comes from somewhere, you know. Any other greens on this forum?
aac is a better coded, true enough. But not very widely supported in music yet.jonahmann wrote:* Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) Audio Layer III (MP3) has been superseded by the Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) algorithm. The Free Lossless Audio Codex (FLAC) is the most widely supported lossless format, not Microsoft's WAV.
I'll have a listen - I suppose this depends on the encoder, whether it's joint stereo or stereo. But either way, when do we listen to just a side channel?jonahmann wrote:* In particular, the side channel of MP3 is unpleasant. Listen to it at 320kb/s.
lol stfu you know what else uses electricity? being on the internet. This is probably the most retarded argument for vinyl i have ever heard.jonahmann wrote:* Downloading data pollutes the environment. The electricity comes from somewhere, you know. Any other greens on this forum?
Mason wrote:lol stfu you know what else uses electricity? being on the internet. This is probably the most retarded argument for vinyl i have ever heard.jonahmann wrote:* Downloading data pollutes the environment. The electricity comes from somewhere, you know. Any other greens on this forum?
hahajohney wrote:fascist
why, because i have a belief? i don't even want you to share them. I actually don't know right now why it's the case, but that doesn't falsify the fact. One of my instructors was involved in the tests.What? How does that work? That's crazy talk.
I thought it was implicit that lossy audio is more energy efficient then lossless audio.And the impact of making a big sheet of plastic from oil has no impact on the environment? Plus the process of recording audio onto said vinyl takes less energy than downloading an mp3? More crazy talk.
Yes, downloading data from the internet. It's also not an argument in favour of vinyl. Vinyl is indeed more wasteful than digital downloads.lol stfu you know what else uses electricity? being on the internet. This is probably the most retarded argument for vinyl i have ever heard.
WAV is actually a lossless compression format.wav is uncompressed mp3 use a lossy compression
If you are so protective of the environment why don't you turn your computer off and go be an idiot in real life? How do you listen to music then?jonahmann wrote:Yes, downloading data from the internet. It's also not an argument in favour of vinyl. Vinyl is indeed more wasteful than digital downloads.lol stfu you know what else uses electricity? being on the internet. This is probably the most retarded argument for vinyl i have ever heard.
WAV is actually raw datajonahmann wrote:WAV is actually a lossless compression format.
paradigm x wrote:Wheres VirtualMark?
Wikipedia wrote:Though a WAV file can hold compressed audio, the most common WAV format contains uncompressed audio