Dubstepforum.com

JizzMan wrote:favourite band of the 90s? thats an easy one m8



I can totally relate

I was totally going to say this as well

southstar wrote:slipknot
corn
limp

Still like the first two/three albums of all these guys.

Even if you don't.

BAD
The Verve
+1 on MSP

Think we're pissing off Dave Grohl and Josh Homme here

Kyuss can get a shout.

Dave Grohl did a reverse Phil Collins mostly.

AxeD wrote:Think we're pissing off Dave Grohl and Josh Homme here

m8, they can suk cris cornell's dik yh

You lot should stick to dubstep & house lyk, weak choices all over the shop m8s

wubstep wrote:You lot should stick to dubstep & house lyk, weak choices all over the shop m8s

Say that to thom yorke's face yh

Harvey Milk
Melvins

Oasis is music by stnuc for idiots with dull lives who like boring wanker beatles rip offs and horrible lyrics.

Oasis sucked because their songs were boring, yet the singer acted as though they were the best thing to ever happen to music, and he also sucked at singing. All of England seemed to worship them and they were just not very good. That singer is a stupid drunk talentless tnuc with an ego the size of the galaxy.

The best bands of the nineties were the Pumpkins and the Foo Fighters. Their (Dave Grohl's) two first albums, released in the mid 90s are a million times better than anything Oasis has ever done in their entire career

Janes Addiction was also great. The Smashing Pumpkins also kick the shit out of Oasis. Oasis was utter garbage.

Pulp were better.

why don't we all just agree that bands in general are pretty shitty

p.s. the reason everyone likes oasis songs is cos tehy have a very simple rhyming scheme that lends itself to nonsensical lyrics that, albeit, sound good.
"slowly walking down the hall, faster than a cannonball"
It literally makes no sense whatsoever, but everyone remembers it. This is Oasis all over. That's why it's good "drunk" or "festive" music but it's shit to listen to by yourself with headphones on, cos then you start to read more into it and you realise it's fairly insubstantial work.

Mr Hyde wrote:Pulp were better.

Fucking lol.

Sonic Youth
Pennywise
NOFX
Rage Against The Machine
Faith no More + Mr. Bungle both
Wilco
No Doubt (first couple records were good)
lots of good bands in the 90s

i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

Oasis write anthemtic, euphoric, proper rock and roll songs with swagger. Slide Away, Champagne Supernova, etc etc

Champagne Supernova is a genuine classic of our generation. As is Wonderwall. Few bands aforementioned here can say their tunes are that.

Oasis are world renowned and universally liked, pretty good for just another rock and roll band from a small town.

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Their frontman is one of the most famous in the world. He has character, he has persona and stage presence. I could go on.

jaydot wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Blur formed earlier and released their debut album years before Oasis

Oh, and they're by far the better band

Liam92 wrote:

jaydot wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Blur formed earlier and released their debut album years before Oasis

Blur make cheesy pop-rock though. Country House? Charming Man? Do me a favour.

jaydot wrote:

Liam92 wrote:

jaydot wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Blur formed earlier and released their debut album years before Oasis

Blur make cheesy pop-rock though. Country House? Charming Man? Do me a favour.

So, they didn't copy Oasis then?

Liam92 wrote:

jaydot wrote:

Liam92 wrote:

jaydot wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Blur formed earlier and released their debut album years before Oasis

Blur make cheesy pop-rock though. Country House? Charming Man? Do me a favour.

So, they didn't copy Oasis then?

Maybe not but they're still dreadful.

jaydot wrote:

Liam92 wrote:

jaydot wrote:

kidshuffle wrote:i'd love to see jaydot finally defend his stance

They spawned a generation of copycats. Blur included.

Blur formed earlier and released their debut album years before Oasis

Blur make cheesy pop-rock though. Country House? Charming Man? Do me a favour.

volcanogeorge wrote:you're a fucking idiot