Page 4 of 4

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:06 am
by Electric_Head
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:05 pm
by Devilsindub
hutyluty wrote:
Devilsindub wrote:So I was thinking of creating a new thread for the reviews of all the tracks on this comp. I think it would be really productive for each producer to get some insight on there creations. Unless nobody gives a fuck of coarse. Who's down?
Go for it fella im sure people would appreciate it. All the tunes are still on thedsf comp page.
Sweet! Should I put the thread in production, review, or just SNH? Don't want to put it in the wrong place and have people bitch about it.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:16 pm
by Electric_Head
It is production after all.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:34 pm
by hutyluty
Devilsindub wrote:
hutyluty wrote:
Devilsindub wrote:So I was thinking of creating a new thread for the reviews of all the tracks on this comp. I think it would be really productive for each producer to get some insight on there creations. Unless nobody gives a fuck of coarse. Who's down?
Go for it fella im sure people would appreciate it. All the tunes are still on thedsf comp page.
Sweet! Should I put the thread in production, review, or just SNH? Don't want to put it in the wrong place and have people bitch about it.
put it in production i fink

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:14 pm
by BloomingAudioLife
Mine was Pinot, also nice one huty i really liked yours

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:20 pm
by Karoshi
Mine was Knee

Had loads of fun making it, first song i have "finished" in a long time.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:20 pm
by hutyluty
so it looks like we have a winner!

congratulations to jesslem o his tune, a worthy winner i think we all agree. should be another comp running next month so keep ur eyes peeled and thanks everyone who entered.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:25 pm
by hutyluty
BloomingAudioLife wrote:Mine was Pinot, also nice one huty i really liked yours
nice 1

yeah i'll put some vocals on it at some point then put it up for dl

(as it is basically ripping off another tune so bad lol)

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:17 pm
by azuk
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:21 pm
by mthrfnk
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.
Want a medal?

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:23 pm
by Devilsindub
Interesting. I didn't think my flow lacked drop but I'm open to understand specifically what you mean. What exactly made the drop not flow?

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:32 pm
by azuk
mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.
Want a medal?
Not really m8 :)

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:38 pm
by Devilsindub
azuk wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.
Want a medal?
Not really m8 :)
:corndance:

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:41 pm
by mthrfnk
azuk wrote:
mthrfnk wrote:
azuk wrote:
Electric_Head wrote:
Icetickle wrote:@devilsindub: you lacked flow in you drop...

@Electric_Head: Not sure but I think your was really repetitive...

Mine was Majka..
Nah, not that repetitive.
I just didn't have a good track structure imo.

Certain styles of music lend themselves to a bit more repetition.
But I think because I wasn't able to EQ my track correctly it meant some of the elements were muddied and some of the elements I expected to be pushed back a bit more were overly upfront.

I blame my headphone amp blowing and having to produce on a sub par amping environment.
Rushing is never a good look.
Bro, I did mine in an hour, without any headphones or speakers other than the built in one on the computer.
Want a medal?
Not really m8 :)
Why not :(

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:54 pm
by azuk
mthrfnk wrote: Why not :(
I'm loaded with em. :lol:

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:45 am
by rickyarbino
I would like to take this opportunity to say YAY.


Thanks for voting, glad people liked the tune!

Re: 48 hour contest voting! FINALL

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:19 pm
by Karoshi
Congrats! good tune!