Page 4 of 4

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:52 pm
by magma
There's never been a true theology because there's always a heretic somewhere poisoning minds.

There's never been a true democracy because someone always forgets to vote.

Purity of ideas isn't something human beings are very good at en masse. Perfect capitalism, perfect communism, perfect whatever is... machine code... and humans can't live like machines no matter how much some of them like to think they could.

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:04 pm
by OGLemon
magma wrote:Perfect capitalism, perfect communism, perfect whatever is... machine code... and humans can't live like machines no matter how much some of them like to think they could.
true. I view my political ideology more as a goal than as a near future reality. The idea that we could achieve a society with absolutely no coercion or authority comes off as a bit idealistic to me, but I believe humanity would be better off if we tried achieving these goals.

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
by ehbes
magma wrote:There's never been a true theology because there's always a heretic somewhere poisoning minds.

There's never been a true democracy because someone always forgets to vote.

Purity of ideas isn't something human beings are very good at en masse. Perfect capitalism, perfect communism, perfect whatever is... machine code... and humans can't live like machines no matter how much some of them like to think they could.
Yeah but I'm perfect so that's all you need to know

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:40 pm
by magma
ehbrums1 wrote:
magma wrote:There's never been a true theology because there's always a heretic somewhere poisoning minds.

There's never been a true democracy because someone always forgets to vote.

Purity of ideas isn't something human beings are very good at en masse. Perfect capitalism, perfect communism, perfect whatever is... machine code... and humans can't live like machines no matter how much some of them like to think they could.
Yeah but I'm perfect so that's all you need to know
From here on out, I'm all about the ehbsonomics.

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:13 pm
by OGLemon
Comrade Ehbrums is the bastion of anti-revisionism and true Marxist dialectics. Without Supreme Leader Ehbrums, who is a perfect incarnation of the appearance that a leader should have, the proletariat will forever remain in shackles. ☭

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:19 pm
by RKM
Comrade Lemon is a dangerous Lemonskyite who is plotting with a group of powerful doctors to poison the work force and undermine noble leader and supreme field commander ehbrums.

Nikolai Lemonzt remains an enemy of the working man and his interest in subversive bourgeois techno is firm evidence of this.

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:16 pm
by ehbes
Comrade Lemon should invest in ice pick protection hint hint

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:19 pm
by ehbes
magma wrote:
ehbrums1 wrote:
magma wrote:There's never been a true theology because there's always a heretic somewhere poisoning minds.

There's never been a true democracy because someone always forgets to vote.

Purity of ideas isn't something human beings are very good at en masse. Perfect capitalism, perfect communism, perfect whatever is... machine code... and humans can't live like machines no matter how much some of them like to think they could.
Yeah but I'm perfect so that's all you need to know
From here on out, I'm all about the ehbsonomics.
Redistribution of boat shoes is key to a healthy economy

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:53 pm
by rickyarbino
ehbrums1 wrote:We also never lived under true feudalism. Only crony feudalism right gene?
Maybe you americans didn't. Feudalism was pretty real in the British Isles at least.

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:09 pm
by ehbes
Completely missed my point, good on you

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:44 pm
by Phigure
classic jesslem

Re: Ninja Economics

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:52 pm
by rickyarbino
ehbrums1 wrote:Completely missed my point, good on you
No point in a poorly described point imo.