Page 4 of 6

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:14 am
by bagelator
Image

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:19 am
by elgato
the 'Gnostic Antichristian Christianity of Reverend Martin Bergman' is heavy!

i evidently need to give this lot more of my time... that is jokes

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:23 am
by boomnoise
bagelator wrote:Image
that is genius. have you ever heard his compositions? now there's a culture industry worth analysing!

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:24 am
by colm
(haven't read the whole thread)


i do see what he's saying but that is the most self-endulgent wanky way he could have possibly expressed it, which is a shame because it's kind of a cool concept - essentially, that Eno needs more bass. :lol:

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:44 pm
by deamonds
boomnoise wrote:this is going round in circles between the people who understand, the people who don't understand, the people who want to understand and the peple who don't give a fuck. and i don't in any way apply value judgement to that, it's just the way it is.
the whole point of a forum disscussion, if we wernt allowed 2 comment or NOT understand, therd b no use for this forum, and anybody who critisises slightly on here nowdays gets shot down in flames

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:05 pm
by smurf
UFO over easy wrote:
Smurf wrote:simplicity is best.
At least you're leading by example :roll:
ramadanman wrote:sine of the dub, innit.
Still my favourite kode 9 tune :)
is that spose to be a dig? good one :roll: i think his stuff is boring, get over it son.

backward, whats that all about? it plods along with no momentum with some rubbish stretched ragga vocal, its been done before and its been done much better. thats my 2p anyway, different strokes for different folks, innit.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:06 pm
by boomnoise
deamonds wrote:
boomnoise wrote:this is going round in circles between the people who understand, the people who don't understand, the people who want to understand and the peple who don't give a fuck. and i don't in any way apply value judgement to that, it's just the way it is.
the whole point of a forum disscussion, if we wernt allowed 2 comment or NOT understand, therd b no use for this forum, and anybody who critisises slightly on here nowdays gets shot down in flames
i take your point but this seems to be particularly true of this thread. my comment was supposed to mean that this could just go on for ever.

and no one's even taken issue with your right to comment and criticise so i find it odd you bring this up. and regarding what you say, it's simply not true. i'm one of the key advocates of consctructive critism on this forum and have started many threads to encourage engaged discussions.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:08 pm
by mos dan
UFO over easy wrote:
Smurf wrote:simplicity is best.
At least you're leading by example :roll:
curse you ben! i wanted to make that joke. :wink:

orwell said that writing should be clear like a window pane. he was right, but no more right than, say, will self, or anyone else who uses the complexity, dexterity and depth of language to full, poetry-in-prose effect. they're just different styles, and one is as valid as another.

large up the nine.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:39 pm
by ufo over easy
mos dan wrote:
UFO over easy wrote:
Smurf wrote:simplicity is best.
At least you're leading by example :roll:
curse you ben! i wanted to make that joke. :wink:
8)
deamonds wrote:and anybody who critisises slightly on here nowdays gets shot down in flames
deamonds in another thread wrote:[fuck off], go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
Gotta love double standards, especially when they're as fucking blatent as this. Not even sure why you brought it up, who's told you you're not allowed to give your opinion?

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:17 pm
by scarecrow
Indeed a cunning linguist and a master debater.
Lolzzzz.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:43 pm
by fubar
boomnoise wrote:wel, the hypedub website might have been good start. i'm tempted to throw people here: http://www.ccru.net/id(entity)/glossary.htm

but that will probably complcate things further!
Haha it allmost seems like its a complete pisstake, allthough I cant believe that much would have gone into it if it was, maybe its just too far over my head;
Aquassassin. Hyper-C frog-warrior.??

Amma (AMusement MAtrix). Maya Technologies' artificial yogic intelligence, whose informatic 'siddhis' constitute the virtual components of a cosmic theme park.
Death Garage. Sonic subgenre characterized by (loud) Swarm-beats.
MMbo-Jumbo!. Y2K data-devastation.
Warp. Region of Djynxx.
It always seems like a bit of mistake over contextualising art, either it does something or it doesn't it shouldnt need explanation through words, thats another medium, allthough I really like kode9's tunes so he can do whatever the fuck he wants really.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:04 pm
by shonky
Think you guys missed out - he's being post-ironic in an urban soundscape milieu.

Or is that what's already been said - don't really understand this artwank gobshitery. Maybe they could discuss it on Late Review.

I do know that most music that I've bought on a concept has generally been unmitigated shite. Music that's good doesn't need an explanation

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:06 pm
by boomnoise
i've always thought of kode's music a 'death garage'. if there's any death garage it's kode9. but i'm not clear on definition according to ccru. who the hell is bobby diablo?

Re: wtf is kode9 on about?

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:35 pm
by bedward
spaceape (via human?) wrote: the truth lies somewhere between a lie and a fiction....
OTM

btw:
who's this chancer then?
ten city wrote: The issue here is Cyber-hype.
join date? 30th sept...
total posts? 1...
name? ten city...
erm.
what's joseph malik up to these days?

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:02 am
by deamonds
UFO over easy wrote:
mos dan wrote:
UFO over easy wrote:
Smurf wrote:simplicity is best.
At least you're leading by example :roll:
curse you ben! i wanted to make that joke. :wink:
8)
deamonds wrote:and anybody who critisises slightly on here nowdays gets shot down in flames
deamonds in another thread wrote:[fuck off], go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
Gotta love double standards, especially when they're as fucking blatent as this. Not even sure why you brought it up, who's told you you're not allowed to give your opinion?
im keeping myself 2 myself from now on, theres no point even posting any of my thoughts on here no more man

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:08 am
by ekstrak
christ.. what a stream of total crap. seems kode9's writing is almost as boring as his music.

this just typifies the impression i'm starting to get of kode 9.. so fuckin full of himself this bloke, have you seen his top 10 record selection ? its 99% Kode 9.. http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4457 what the fuck is that all about.. trust me kid.. ya aint all that

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:15 am
by dolly
ekstrak wrote:christ.. what a stream of total crap. seems kode9's writing is almost as boring as his music.

this just typifies the impression i'm starting to get of kode 9.. so fuckin full of himself this bloke, have you seen his top 10 record selection ? its 99% Kode 9.. http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4457 what the fuck is that all about ?
:o That's a bit deep in it??

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:07 am
by boomnoise
doLLy wrote:
ekstrak wrote:christ.. what a stream of total crap. seems kode9's writing is almost as boring as his music.

this just typifies the impression i'm starting to get of kode 9.. so fuckin full of himself this bloke, have you seen his top 10 record selection ? its 99% Kode 9.. http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4457 what the fuck is that all about ?
:o That's a bit deep in it??
yeah i didn't want to reply to this but i feel it needs doing.

kode9 isn't full of himself. ask any dj/artsist and they are bound to include their own productions, especially when he was in the middle of producing his album and probably somewhat time stretched.

the interview typifies nothing. for every answered question there are thousands of unanswered ones and you can't possibly build up a solid profile of the individual based on this, a largely polemical interview and one in which he says that these ideas are seperate from his music.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:21 am
by elgato
lol what the fuck

look at his dj sets then ask yourself how consumed he is by his own music... easily the most diverse and open-minded dj of the central players

you should think twice before voicing such judgement based on so little information, especially about his CHARACTER...it seems to me that this is something that should be kept for personal conversations or whatever, the forum shouldnt be for bitching about how you perceive someones personality to be!

and BORING MUSIC?! i swear you lot must be thinking of a different kode9

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:27 am
by ekstrak
sorry, didnt realise dubstepforum was soley for bigging people up. my appologies if you find my taste offensive